Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Apr 25.
Published in final edited form as: J Chem Inf Model. 2022 Apr 5;62(8):1819–1829. doi: 10.1021/acs.jcim.1c01497

Table 1:

RBFE performance after ablating different components of the network on the 1 additional ligand set to determine their utility in the full network. Parentheses indicate the ±1 standard deviation of the 25 train/test versions. Bold indicates that it is not significantly different from the Standard model (p > 0.005).

Ablation Pearson’s R RMSE (pK) MAE (pK)
Standard 0.553(±0.0233) 1.11(±0.0309) 0.82(±0.0187)
No LΔΔG 0.5510.0202) 1.120.0248) 0.8290.0179)
No LΔG 0.459(±0.0238) 1.27(±0.0289) 0.945(±0.0182)
No LRotation 0.5560.0188) 1.110.0233) 0.8190.0162)
No LConsistency 0.5360.021) 1.14(±0.0356) 0.842(±0.0186)
No LΔΔG, LConsistency −0.0576(±0.136) 1.24(±0.0143) 0.908(±0.0144)
No LΔG, LConsistency 0.456(±0.0231) 1.28(±0.0319) 0.95(±0.0233)
Concatenation 0.5540.0134) 1.110.0223) 0.8210.0174)
No Siamese Network 0.5(±0.0347) 1.15(±0.0362) 0.854(±0.021)
Subtraction, Single-order 0.512(±0.0213) 1.17(±0.0213) 0.877(±0.0151)
Concatentation, Single-order 0.476(±0.023) 1.21(±0.0253) 0.907(±0.0182)