Table 4.

Bivariate correlates of CAI among MSM and TW at high risk for HIV acquisition, stratified by sexual partnership type, Lima, Peru

	Main Partner	Casual Partner	One-Time Partner	Client
	OR	OR	OR	OR
Age
<22	Ref	Ref	Ref	Ref
22 – <26	0.86	0.85	0.9	1.01
26 – <33	0.87	0.87	0.89	0.82
≥33	0.72 b	0.75 b	0.89	0.71
Education
Less than Secondary	Ref	Ref	Ref	Ref
Completed Secondary	0.92	1.05	1.09	0.77
Any post-secondary	0.77 a	0.98	0.92	0.76
Income
No Monthly Income	Ref	Ref	Ref	Ref
Monthly income less than min wage	1.22	1.11	1.14	0.93
Monthly income at or above min wage	1.19	1.12	1.07	0.98
Sexual Orientation/ Gender Identity
Trans	1.59 c	1.27 a	1.28 a	1.17
Homosexual	Ref	Ref	Ref	Ref
Bisexual	1.08	1	1.04	0.84
Heterosexual	0.76	0.9	0.95	0.87
Female Sex Partner in Prior 3 Months d
Yes vs No (reference)	1.16	1.06	1.14	1.07
Sexual Role
Insertive	Ref	Ref	Ref	Ref
Receptive	1.21 a	1.23 a	1.28 a	1.22
Versatile	1.1	1.24 a	1.24 a	1.43
Transactional Sex d
Yes vs No (reference)	1.74 c	1.32 c	1.33 c	1.56 b
AUD d
Yes vs No (reference)	1.60 c	1.60 c	1.57 c	1.71 c
Alcohol Use in Prior 30 days
Yes vs No (reference)	1.25 c	1.06	0.97	1.03
Drug Use in Prior 30 Days
Yes vs No (reference)	1.36 b	1.48 c	1.39 b	1.58 b
Met Sex Partner at a Social Venue in Last 30 Days
Yes vs No (Reference)	1.46 c	1.70 c	1.51 c	1.70 c
One Main Partner in Past 30 Days
Yes vs No (Reference)	0.50 c	0.69 c	0.66 c	0.54 c

^ap <0.05.

^bp <0.01

^cp <0.001

^dThe following variables were only collected at baseline: female sex partner in prior 3 months, transactional sex, AUD