Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 13;10(2):197–206. doi: 10.14218/JCTH.2021.00188

Table 3. Diagnostic performance of LSM for each histopathological fibrosis stage as determined by biopsy interpretation.

Patient group Liver biopsy fibrosis stages AUROC (95% confidence interval) LSM cut-off, kPa Sensitivity Specificity PPV NPV
All patients, Youden’s index (n=109) Stage 0 vs. 1–4 0.74 (0.64–0.83) 11.95 0.53 0.91 0.93 0.48
Stage 0–1 vs. 2–4 0.80 (0.72–0.89) 12.3 0.67 0.88 0.83 0.75
Stage 0–2 vs. 3–4 0.87 (0.80–0.93) 10.75 0.94 0.69 0.56 0.96
Stage 0–3 vs. 4 0.90 (0.83–0.98) 20.45 0.83 0.85 0.40 0.98
All patients, sensitivity=0.90 (n=109) Stage 0 vs. 1–4 5.55 0.90 0.34 0.74 0.62
Stage 0–1 vs. 2–4 6.85 0.90 0.47 0.60 0.84
Stage 0–2 vs. 3–4 11.05 0.90 0.72 0.57 0.95
Stage 0–3 vs. 4 13.25 0.90 0.71 0.28 0.98
All patients, specificity=0.90 (n=109) Stage 0 vs. 1–4 11.95 0.53 0.90 0.92 0.47
Stage 0–1 vs. 2–4 14.05 0.64 0.90 0.85 0.74
Stage 0–2 vs. 3–4 23.35 0.41 0.90 0.63 0.78
Stage 0–3 vs. 4 25.40 0.67 0.90 0.45 0.96

AUROC, area under the receiver operating characteristics; LSM, liver stiffness measurement; NPV, negative predictive value; PPV, positive predictive value.