Skip to main content
. 2022 Apr 11;24(4):e29842. doi: 10.2196/29842

Table 3.

Results of stratified anxiety meta-analyses.

Stratified analyses Quality of the included studies Total studies, n Standardized mean difference (95% CI) Cochran Q (df) Cochran Q, P value I2 (%)
Randomization type

Clustered [42,49,53] 1 good; 2 poor 3 −0.22 (−0.32 to −0.12) 1.52 (2) .47 0.0

Other [39-41,44,45,48,52,54] 2 good; 2 fair; 4 poor 8 −0.22 (−0.42 to −0.02) 14.16 (7) .048 50.6
Analysis type

Intention to treat [39,44,45,52] 1 good; 2 fair; 1 poor 4 −0.14 (−0.34 to 0.05) 4.10 (3) .25 26.9

Other or unclear [40-42,48,49,53,54] 2 good; 5 poor 7 −0.25 (−0.41 to −0.09) 10.84 (6) .09 44.7
Intervention type

Treatment [39-42,45,48,49,52,54] 2 good; 2 fair; 5 poor 9 −0.18 (−0.33 to −0.03) 14.60 (8) .07 45.2

Prevention [44,53] 1 good; 1 poor 2 −0.30 (−0.48 to −0.11) 0.30 (1) .59 0.0
Control group type

Treatment [39,45,49] 3 good; 1 fair; 5 poor 3 −0.07 (−0.26 to 0.12) 0.78 (2) .68 0.0

Other [39-42,44,48,49,52-54] 1 good; 2 fair 10 −0.23 (−0.36 to 0.10) 14.31 (9) .11 37.1
Study quality

Good [40,44,49] 3 good 3 −0.25 (−0.47 to −0.03) 2.98 (2) .23 32.8

Fair [39,45] 2 fair 2 −0.08 (−0.31 to 0.15) 0.05 (1) .83 0.0

Poor [41,42,48,52-54] 6 poor 6 −0.22 (−0.43 to −0.02) 10.97 (5) .05 54.4