Skip to main content
. 2022 Apr 11;24(4):e29842. doi: 10.2196/29842

Table 4.

Results of stratified depression meta-analyses.

Stratified analyses Quality of the included studies Total number of studies, N Standardized mean difference (95% CI) Cochran Q (df) Cochran Q, P value I2 (%)
Randomization type

Clustered [42,46,53] 3 poor 3 −0.14 (−0.24 to −0.03) 1.07 (2) .59 0.0

Other [40,44,45,48,51,52,54] 3 good; 1 fair; 3 poor 7 −0.26 (−0.53 to 0.01) 18.32 (6) .005 67.2
Analysis type

Intention to treat [44,45,51,52] 2 good; 1 fair; 1 poor 4 −0.24 (−0.56 to −0.07) 8.29 (3) .04 63.8

Other or unclear [40,42,46,48,53,54] 1 good; 5 poor 6 −0.22 (−0.43 to −0.01) 13.14 (5) .02 62.0
Intervention type

Treatment [40,42,45,48,51,52,54] 2 good; 1 fair; 4 poor 7 −0.22 (−0.46 to 0.03) 19.18 (6) .004 68.7

Prevention [44,46,53] 1 good; 2 poor 3 −0.26 (−0.43 to −0.09) 2.12 (2) .35 5.9
Control group type

Treatment [45,46] 1 fair; 1 poor 2 −0.17 (−0.49 to 0.14) 1.47 (1) .23 32.1

Other [40,42,44,46,48,51-54] 3 good; 6 poor 9 −0.25 (−0.43 to −0.07) 21.01 (8) .007 61.9
Study quality

Good [40,44,51] 3 good 3 −0.10 (−0.49 to 0.29) 4.52 (2) .11 55.7

Fair [45] 1 fair 1 −0.06 (−0.34 to 0.23) N/Aa N/A N/A

Poor [42,46,48,52-54] 6 poor 6 −0.32 (−0.56 to −0.08) 16.74 (5) .005 70.1

aN/A: not applicable. Only 1 study was included in this stratification.