Skip to main content
Food Chemistry: X logoLink to Food Chemistry: X
. 2021 Dec 30;13:100198. doi: 10.1016/j.fochx.2021.100198

Phytochemical properties and functional characteristics of wild turmeric (Curcuma aromatica) fermented with Rhizopus oligosporus

Juho Lim a,1, Thi Thanh Hanh Nguyen b,1, Kunal Pal c, Choon Gil Kang d, Chanho Park d, Seung Wook Kim d, Doman Kim a,b,
PMCID: PMC9039939  PMID: 35499023

Highlights

  • Wild turmeric (Curcuma aromatica) was fermented with R. oligosporus.

  • Curcuminoid fermented for 5 days and phenolic compound of all fermented wild turmeric increased.

  • The l-carnitine content of fermented wild turmeric was newly synthesized.

  • The antioxidant activities were enhanced 1.47-fold after fermentation for 3 days.

  • Anti-inflammatory, anti-melanogenic, and anti-obesity effects improved with fermentation.

Keywords: Anti-inflammation, l-carnitine, Lipid-accumulation, Solid-state fermentation, Rhizopus oligosporus, Wild turmeric

Abstract

This study investigated the effect of solid-state fermentation of wild turmeric (Curcuma aromatica) with Rhizopus oligosporus, a common fungus found in fermented soy tempeh, on phytochemical and biological properties. Ultra-performance liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry showed that fermented wild turmeric has higher concentrations of curcumin, demethoxycurcumin, bisdemethoxycurcumin, phenolic compounds and total flavonoid-curcuminoid after fermentation for 1-, 3-, and 5-day relative to non-fermented turmeric. The l-carnitine content reached 242 µg g−1 extract after fermentation for 7-day. Wild turmeric had 1.47- and 2.25-fold increases in ORAC and FRAP, respectively, after 3-day fermentation. The inhibitory effects of fermented wild turmeric on lipid accumulation from 3T3-L1 cells, nitric oxide production from lipopolysaccharide-stimulated RAW264.7 murine macrophages, and melanin formation by B16F10 mouse melanoma cells with α-MSH increased 1.08-, 1.44-, and 1.52-fold, respectively, after 3-day fermentation. Based on these results, fermented wild turmeric product can be used as a functional ingredient in the cosmeceutical and nutraceutical industries.

1. Introduction

Wild turmeric (Curcuma aromatica) of the genus Curcuma in family Zingiberaceae is widely planted in China, Japan, and India (Xiang et al., 2017). C. aromatica is characterized by a bright yellow aromatic rhizome and camphoraceous odor. It is commonly used as a coloring and flavoring agent, as well as in traditional medicines (Rajkumari and Sanatombi, 2018). The rhizomes of wild turmeric contain curcuminoids (curcumin, demethoxycurcumin, and bisdemethoxycurcumin) and essential oils including xanthorrhizol, ar-curcumene, di-epi-α-cedrene, turmerone, ar-turmerone, zingiberene, β-sesquiphellandrene, germacrone, 8,9-dehydro-9-formyl-cycloisolongifolene, furanodienone, and zederone (Kulyal et al., 2021) that contribute to its anti-inflammatory, anticancer, antibacterial, antiobesity, antidiabetic, and antioxidant activities (Xiang et al., 2018, Xiang et al., 2017). Although C. aromatica is one of the most common Curcuma species and is widely used along with Curcuma longa (turmeric), limited literature is available related to enhancement of its food value, nutritional composition, and health benefits. In addition, the strong flavor and taste of turmeric limit its use in food industrial applications and decrease palatability to consumers (Kim et al., 2016).

Solid-state fermentation (SSF) has gained attention in recent years from biotech industries including in bioremediation; biofuels; production of lipids, flavors, and aromas for food; and production of bioactive compounds (Sala, Barrena, Artola, & Sanchez, 2019). SSF involves the growth of microorganisms on a solid substrate with a low moisture content (Holker, Hofer, & Lenz, 2004). Fungi are the main group of microorganisms used for SSF (Sala et al., 2019). SSF has several advantages over submerged fermentation including high volumetric productivity, product concentration, simplicity, and low sterilization cost (Jimenez-Quero, Pollet, Averous, & Phalip, 2020). SSF with Trichoderma spp. and Aspergillus oryzae has been used for the fermentation of turmeric (C. longa L.) (Kim et al., 2014, Mohamed et al., 2016). Compared to non-fermented turmeric, turmeric fermented with Trichoderma spp. showed increases in water solubility, total phenolic content, and antioxidant and antibacterial activities (Mohamed et al., 2016). Turmeric fermented with A. oryzae was effective at preventing CCl4-induced hepatic damage in rats; reducing white adipose tissue weight, serum triglyceride, and cholesterol in rats with high-fat diet-induced obesity; and showed improvement of the strong taste and bitterness, thereby increasing consumer acceptance (Kim et al., 2016, Kim et al., 2014).

Rhizopus oligosporus is a common fungus used for fermentation of soy tempeh. It produces various enzymes including amylase, protease, glucoamylase, and lipase, as well as carbohydrate-cleaving enzymes including xylanase, β-glucuronidase, and β-glucosidase to synthesize l-carnitine, γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA), and polyphenols during fermentation (Huynh et al., 2014, McCue and Shetty, 2003). Recently, we reported improvement of l-carnitine, GABA, and bioactive phenolic compound contents, as well as the biological properties of quinoa, ginseng, and buckwheat through SSF using R. oligosporus (Hur et al., 2018, Lee et al., 2020, Park et al., 2018). Moreover, coffee fermented via SSF using R. oligosporus had improved aroma and sweetness (Lee, Cheong, Curran, Yu, & Liu, 2016).

This study aims to analyze the physicochemical properties and functional characteristics of R. oligosporus-fermented wild turmeric extract. Wild turmeric was subjected to solid state fermentation. l-carnitine, vanillin, ferulic acid, curcumin, demethoxycurcumin, and bisdemethoxycurcumin in the extracts were identified by ultra-performance liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS) and the volatile compounds responsible for the sensory attributes of fermented wild turmeric were characterized by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS). The antioxidant properties of wild turmeric were determined by Oxygen Radical Absorbance Capacity (ORAC) and Ferric Reducing Antioxidant Power (FRAC) assays. In addition, anti-inflammatory activity in RAW264.7 murine macrophages, anti-melanogenic activity in B16F10 mouse melanoma cells, and anti-lipid accumulation activity in mouse 3T3-L1 cells was evaluated.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Materials and reagents

Wild turmeric powder was purchased from Good Herb Inc. (Seoul, Korea). Curcumin, demethoxycurcumin (DMC), bisdemethoxycurcumin (BDMC), and l-carnitine were purchased from Tokyo Chemical Industry Co., Ltd (Tokyo, Japan). Folin–Ciocalteau reagent, 2,2′-azobis (2-methylpropionmidine) dihydrochloride (AAPH), 6-hydroxy-2,5,7,8-tetramethylchromane-2-carboxylic acid (Trolox), lipopolysaccharides (LPS), indomethacin, vanillin, ferulic acid, alpha-melanocyte-stimulating hormone (α-MSH), dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), quercetin (Q), and gallic acid (GA), were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Fluorescein was purchased from Alfa Aesar (Haverhill, MA, USA). Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM), bovine calf serum (BCS), and fetal bovine serum (FBS) were purchased from Gene Depot (Barker, TX, USA), and penicillin and streptomycin (PS) were purchased from Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA, USA). Ez-CyTox solution for cell viability assays was purchased from Daeil Lab Service (Seoul, Korea).

2.2. Solid-state fermentation of wild turmeric with R. oligosporus

2.2.1. Preparation of the fermented wild turmeric

R. oligosporus KCCM 11948P was obtained from our previous study (Park et al., 2017) and cultured on potato dextrose agar (PDA, Difco, Detroit, MI, USA) at 30 °C for 5 days to obtain spores. Turmeric powder (10 g) was placed in a tetragonal stainless‐steel container (100 × 40 mm), and soaked in water at a ratio of 1:2 (w/w) for 12 h at 22 °C. Soaked turmeric was autoclaved (JSAT-105; JSR, Gongju, Korea) at 121 °C for 20 min. Autoclaved turmeric was cooled to ambient temperature (22 °C) and inoculated with 10% (v/w) R. oligosporus spore suspension (106 spores mL−1). After covering the container with wrapping paper, turmeric was incubated at 30 °C and 70–95% relative humidity for 1-, 3-, 5-, and 7-day. Experiments were carried out with three replicates for each incubation period. Finally, fermented wild turmeric was frozen at − 80 °C and lyophilized at 0 °C and 10 Pa (Eyela FD-550; Rikakikai Co., Tokyo, Japan).

2.2.2. Sample extraction

A 1-g sample of wild turmeric or fermented wild turmeric was extracted into 10 mL of 70% (v/v) ethanol through shaking for 1 h at 150 rpm and 30 °C, followed by sonication (VCX 130 Ultrasonic Processor, Sonics and Materials, Inc., Newtown, CT, USA; 3 min sonication amplitude of 40%, output wattage of 20, 5 repeats, on ice). The supernatant was obtained through centrifugation (9600 × g for 15 min at 4 °C). The pellets were subjected to the process described above three times, and the supernatant was filtered using Whatman No. 1 filter paper (Piscataway, NJ, USA). Next, ethanol was removed by evaporation (Heidolph Instruments, Schwabach, Germany) and lyophilized at 0 °C and 10 Pa for further analysis. The extraction yield was calculated as described in our previous report (Hur et al., 2018), as follows:

Extractionyield(%)=Extractmass(g)Wildturmericmass(g)×100

2.3. Phytochemical analysis of fermented wild turmeric

2.3.1. Total phenolic content (TPC) and total flavonoid-curcuminoid content (TFCC) analysis

The TPC of wild turmeric and fermented wild turmeric was determined using the Folin–Ciocalteau method with gallic acid as the standard. TPC values are presented as mM gallic acid equivalent g−1 (mM GAE g−1) (Hur et al., 2018). TFCC analysis was performed using the aluminum chloride colorimetric method (Chang, Yang, Wen, & Chern, 2002) with quercetin (0–330.9 µM) as the standard. TFCC was expressed as mM quercetin equivalent g−1 (mM QE g−1).

2.3.2. l-carnitine analysis

Ten milligrams of non– or fermented wild turmeric extracted powder was dissolved in DMSO, diluted with methanol, and filtered through a 0.2 μm pore-size membrane syringe filter (Pall, NY, USA). A 1 μL sample was injected into the UPLC-MS system (Acquity H-Class system with a QDa detector; Waters, Milford, MA, USA) and separated using an Acquity UPLC Beh HILIC column (1.7 μm, 2.1 × 100 mm; Waters) at 40 °C. The elution gradient for l-carnitine analysis was previously reported (Lee et al., 2020). Positive electrospray ionization (ESI) was controlled with selected ion recording (SIR) (m/z 162). The capillary energy and cone voltage were 1.5 kV and 10 V, respectively. A calibration curve was prepared using various l-carnitine concentrations (0.02–2 μg mL-1) (Table S1).

2.3.3. Curcuminoids, vanillin, and ferulic acid analysis

A 1 μL sample was injected into the UPLC-MS system and separated using an Acquity UPLC Beh C18 column (1.7 μm, 2.1 × 150 mm; Waters) at 40 °C. The mobile phase for analysis was composed of acetonitrile containing 0.1% (v/v) formic acid (solvent A) and water containing 0.1% (v/v) formic acid (solvent B). For analysis of curcuminoids, the initial elution gradient was 5% A, with increases to 50% A at 1.0 min, 70% A at 5.0 min, and 100% A at 6.5 min, a decrease to 5% A at 7.1 min, and a hold at that level until 12.0 min for equilibrium, with a flow rate of 0.3 min mL−1. For analyses of vanillin and ferulic acid, the initial elution gradient was 5% A, which increased to 10% A at 0.5 min, 15% A at 2.1 min, 23% A at 10.0 min, 50% A at 12.0 min, 60% A at 15.0 min, and 100% A at 15.1 min, then decreased to 5% A at 16.1 min, and was maintained at that level until 25.0 min for an equilibration step, with a flow rate of 0.3 min mL−1. Positive ESI was controlled with SIR (m/z 369.27 for curcumin, m/z 339.22 for demethoxycurcumin, m/z 309.19 for bisdemethoxycurcumin, m/z 195.13 for ferulic acid, and m/z 153.11 for vanillin). The capillary energy and cone voltage used for assessment of curcuminoids were 1.3 kV and 10 V and 1.5 kV and 10 V for vanillin and ferulic acid, respectively. A calibration curve was prepared using various concentration of curcuminoids (0.02–2 μg mL−1), vanillin (0.08–2.0 μg mL−1), and ferulic acid (0.04–2 μg mL−1) (Table S1).

2.3.4. Analysis of volatile compounds in fermented wild turmeric

Volatile compounds in non-fermented and fermented wild turmeric were extracted through headspace-solid-phase microextraction (HS-SPME). A 3 g sample of wild turmeric powder or fermented wild turmeric was weighed into a 20 mL screw-capped headspace vial and subjected to HS-SPME at 60 °C for 30 min with agitation. Divinylbenzene/carboxen/polydimethylsiloxane (50/30 μm DVB/CAR/PDMS) was used. The volatile components of wild turmeric and fermented wild turmeric were assessed in a 7890 N GC coupled to a 5975C inert MSD Mass Detector (Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA, USA). The SPME fiber was thermally desorbed into an HP-5MS column (30 m × 0.25 mm inner diameter, 0.25 μm film thickness; Agilent Technologies) in splitless mode. Helium was used as the carrier gas with the flow rate set to 1.5 mL min−1. The GC oven temperature was maintained at 50 °C for 3 min, increased to 150 °C at a rate of 5 °C min−1, to 200 °C at a rate of 10 °C min−1, and to 280 °C at a rate of 50 °C min−1, and then held at that temperature for 3 min. The range of mass detection was m/z 33 to 500. Volatiles were identified through comparison of their retention times and mass spectra with those of standards.

2.4. Antioxidant activity

2.4.1. Oxygen radical absorbance capacity (ORAC) assay

The ORAC assay of wild turmeric and fermented wild turmeric was conducted according to the method reported by Ou, Hampsch-Woodill, & Prior (2001) with Trolox as a standard, fluorescein as a probe, and AAPH to induce radical formation. The fluorescence of the reaction was read every 3 min (λexcitation = 485 nm, λemission = 538 nm) for up to 90 min at constant 37 °C with the SpectraMax M3 microplate reader (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA, USA). The net area under the curve (AUC) was estimated by subtracting the AUC of the blank from the AUC of the reacted sample. Antioxidant activity was expressed as μM Trolox equivalent g−1 (µM TE g−1).

2.4.2. Ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) assay

FRAP assays of wild turmeric and fermented wild turmeric were conducted according to our previous report (Lee et al., 2020). A 20 μL sample of wild turmeric, fermented wild turmeric, or Trolox (1 – 40 μM) was mixed with 180 μL FRAP solution containing 0.3 M sodium acetate buffer (pH 3.6), 10 mM 2,4,6-tripyridyl-s-triazine, and 20 mM ferric chloride hexahydrate solution at a 1:10:1 (v/v/v) ratio. After a 30 min incubation in the dark, the reaction mixture was measured at 593 nm using the SpectraMax M3 microplate reader. FRAP was expressed as mM Fe2+g−1.

2.5. Viability assay

Mouse 3T3L1 cells, RAW264.7 murine macrophages, and B16F10 mouse melanoma cells were obtained from the Korean Cell Line Bank (KCLB, Seoul, Korea). Mouse 3T3-L1 cells were cultured in DMEM supplemented with 10% (v/v) BCS, 100 U mL−1 penicillin, and 100 µg mL−1 streptomycin at 37 °C in 5% CO2; RAW264.7 murine macrophage cells and B16F10 mouse melanoma cells were cultured in DMEM supplemented with 10% (v/v) FBS, 100 U mL−1 penicillin, and 100 µg mL−1 streptomycin at 37 °C under 5% CO2. Cells grown in a 96-well plate at 2 × 104 cells/well were incubated for 24 h at 37 °C under 5% CO2. Next, various concentrations of wild turmeric or fermented wild turmeric (12.5–200 μg mL−1) were added to the wells of a 96-well plate and incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. Subsequently, 90 µL of culture medium mixed with 10 µL of Ez-CyTox solution were added and incubated for 1 h at 37 °C, and cell viability was measured at 450 nm using a SpectraMax M3 microplate reader. Cell viability was calculated relative to the control.

2.6. Anti-lipid accumulation test

Mouse 3T3-L1 cells grown in a six-well plate at 1 × 105 cells/well were incubated at 37 °C until 100% confluence. Two days after reaching confluence, differentiation was induced by replacing the growth medium with differentiation medium (DMEM, 10% FBS, 10 µg mL−1 insulin, 500 µM 3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine, and 1 µM dexamethasone) in the presence or absence of 50 µg mL−1 samples (wild turmeric and fermented wild turmeric) (Kim et al., 2021). After 2 days, this induction medium was replaced with DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS and 100 U mL−1 penicillin and streptomycin. After 7 days of differentiation, differentiated 3T3-L1 cells were fixed with 3.7% (v/v) formaldehyde for 30 min, and then removed. The fixed cells were stained with Oil red O staining solution for 15 min in the dark. Lipid droplets within the differentiated 3T3-L1 cells were visualized with a Zeiss Observer Z1 microscope (Carl Zeiss, Jena, Germany) and photographed with an AxioCam HRc camera. For quantitative analysis, Oil Red O staining was performed through elution with isopropanol and absorbance was measured at 490 nm using a SpectraMax M3 microplate reader. The results of lipid accumulation were expressed as percentages relative to the control.

2.7. Measurement of nitric oxide production

RAW264.7 murine macrophages were seeded in a 96-well plate at 2 × 104 cells/well and cultured for 24 h at 37 °C. The cells were treated with 25 µg mL−1 sample and 1 µg LPS/mL at 37 °C for 24 h. Cells treated with 1 µg mL−1 LPS and 100 µM indomethacin were used as the control. Then, 80 µL of culture supernatant was mixed with the same volume of Griess reagent, held at room temperature for 20 min, then measured for absorbance at 540 nm (Lee et al., 2020, Xu et al., 2021).

2.8. Anti-melanogenesis test

B16F10 mouse melanoma cells were seeded into a six-well plate at 1 × 105 cells/well and cultured for 24 h at 37 °C. Then, the cells were treated with 100 nM α-MSH and 50 µg mL−1 wild turmeric or fermented wild turmeric for 72 h. Next, the cells were trypsinized and centrifuged at 1500 × g for 3 min. The cell pellets were solubilized in 1 M NaOH containing 10% (v/v) DMSO and melted at 80 °C for 30 min. Absorbance was measured at 405 nm using a SpectraMax M3 microplate reader.

2.9. Statistical analysis

All experiments were performed in triplicate, and all data are presented as mean ± standard deviation. Statistical comparisons were made using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test and the Pearson correlation test in SPSS software. Values were considered significant at p < 0.05. Principal component analysis (PCA) based on a correlation matrix was conducted to differentiate the effects of fermented wild turmeric using SigmaPlot v14.5 (Systat Software, San Diego, CA, USA).

3. Results and discussion

3.1. Influence of solid-state fermentation on phytochemical components of wild turmeric

3.1.1. Total phenol content and total flavonoid-curcuminoid content

To enhance the functionality, flavor, and nutritional value of wild turmeric, we fermented wild turmeric using R. oligosporus. After fermentation, the extraction yield, TPC, and TFCC of extracted wild turmeric, as well as those of fermented wild turmeric after 1-, 3-, 5-, and 7-day fermentation , were determined. The extraction yields of non-fermented, and 1-, 3-, 5-, and 7-day fermented wild turmeric were 18.2%, 17.5%, 19.4%, 17.7%, and 15.9%, respectively. As shown in Table 1, the TPC increased from 397 ± 8.8 mM GAE g−1 in non-fermented wild turmeric to 584 ± 18 mM GAE g−1 after 3-day fermentation, then decreased to 538 ± 10 and 461 ± 7.6 mM GAE g−1 after 5-day and 7-day fermentation, respectively. The TFCC of wild turmeric increased from 56.6 ± 6.1 mM QE g−1 to 127.2 ± 5.6 mM QE g−1 after 3-day fermentation, and then gradually decreased to 69.5 ± 6.5 mM QE g−1 after 7-day fermentation (Table 1). Curcuminoids are classified as diarylheptanoids and composed of two aromatic ο-methoxy phenol groups linked with a seven-carbon chain (Priyadarsini, 2013). To date, over 300 diarylheptanoids in the Zingiberaceae and related families have been reported. Although, curcumin, DMC, and BDMC are the main curcuminoids in turmeric, as determined by UPLC-MS, other curcuminoids such as cyclocurcumin, 3′-demethoxycuclocurcumin, and tetrahydrocurcumin were also found (Li, 2011). In addition, other curcuminoids such as curcumin sulphate, hexahydrocurcumin, tetrahydrocurcumin, dihydrocurcumin, curcuminglucuronide, hexahydrocurcuminol are reportedly present in curcumin metabolites (Li, 2011). Although curcuminoids do not belong to the flavonoid group, they employ a similar mechanism as flavonoids, binding to AlCl3 through the β-diketone group - while keto and hydroxyl groups of flavonoids form an acid-stable complex with AlCl3 - in the aluminum chloride colorimetric method of total flavonoid content determination (Priyadarsini, 2013). Therefore, the flavonoids include not only curcumin, DMC, and BDMC, but also other curcuminoids in fermented wild turmeric. Several flavonoids are found in turmeric, such as luteolin-7-O-(6″-p-hydroxybenzoyl-β-d-glucopyranoside), luteolin 7-O-β-d-glucopyranoside, apigenin-7-O-β-d-glucopyranoside, luteolin, apigenin, apigenin 7-O-rhamnoside 4′-O-glucoside, 7-methoxyapigenin-6-C-glucoside (Shabana, Shahy, Taha, Mahdy, & Mahmoud, 2015) Manal & Manal, 2014). Thus, the aluminum chloride colorimetric method was used for the determination of both flavonoid and curcuminoid contents in this study. The TPC and TFCC of the fermented wild turmeric were enhanced by 1.12–1.47-fold and 1.23–2.25-fold compared to non-fermented wild turmeric. The highest TPC and TFCC of fermented wild turmeric were obtained after 3-day fermentation. Previous studies have reported that SSF caused increases of TPC from 41 to 80 mg GAE kg−1 in quinoa after 5-day fermentation with R. oligosporus (Hur et al., 2018), from 2.84 mM GAE g−1 to 5.65 mM GAE g−1 in wild ginseng after 7-day fermentation with R. oligosporus (Lee et al., 2020), and from 2.5 to 23.3 mg GAE g−1 in turmeric fermented with Trichoderma spp. (Mohamed et al., 2016). Hur et al. (2018) showed that 5-day SSF of quinoa with R. oligosporus increased the total flavonoid content by up to 1.46-fold relative to non-fermented quinoa. The increases of TPC and TFCC in wild turmeric fermented with R. oligosporus could lead to production of carbohydrate-cleaving enzymes such as α/β-amylase, β-glucuronidase, and β-glucosidase, which degrade the cell wall matrix and generate polyphenols from carbohydrate-conjugated phenolic compounds during fermentation (Huynh et al., 2014, McCue and Shetty, 2003).

Table 1.

Phytochemical properties and antioxidant activities of fermented wild turmeric.

Fermented turmeric (day) l-carnitine
Curcumin
DMC
BDMC
Vanilin
Ferulic acid
ORAC
FRAP
TPC
TFCC
µg g−1 extract (µM TE g−1 extract) (mM Fe2+ g−1 extract) (mM GAE g−1 extract) (mM QE g−1 extract)
0 ND 4560 ± 56a 1147 ± 7b 444 ± 29b 257 ± 3d 533 ± 34ab 1010 ± 67a 214.8 ± 3.0a 397 ± 8.8a 56.6 ± 6.1a
1 ND 5313 ± 45c 1339 ± 12d 526 ± 36b 114 ± 2c 576 ± 6b 1174 ± 87a 263.4 ± 11.7b 444 ± 8.8b 90.7 ± 3.9b
3 26.6 ± 1.4a 4660 ± 104ab 1187 ± 9c 457 ± 37b 47 ± 1a 492 ± 10a 1471 ± 47b 336.4 ± 11.9d 584 ± 18d 127.2 ± 5.6d
5 117 ± 0.5b 4813 ± 83b 1166 ± 3bc 459 ± 32b 57 ± 5b 546 ± 19b 1423 ± 98b 286.2 ± 6.1c 538 ± 10c 111.1 ± 0.7c
7 242 ± 3.4c 4513 ± 108a 1121 ± 14a 356 ± 14a 44 ± 4a 683 ± 13c 1414 ± 67b 210.5 ± 4.9a 461 ± 7.6b 69.5 ± 6.5a

DMC: demethoxycurcumin; BDMC: bisdemethoxycurcumin; ORAC: Oxygen Radical Absorbance Capacity; FRAP: Ferric Reducing Antioxidant Power; TPC: total phenolic content; TFCC: total flavonoid-curcuminoid content. ND: non-detected. All experiments were carried out in triplicate, and all the data were expressed as the mean ± standard deviation. The different letters of the alphabet in each column represent significant differences (p < 0.05).

3.1.2. l-carnitine

l-carnitine (3-hydroxy-4-N-trimethylaminobutyrate) is a quaternary amine that plays a crucial role in mitochondrial β-oxidation of fatty acids by transporting long-chain fatty acids across the mitochondrial membrane and buffering the free CoA/acetyl-CoA ratio. l-carnitine is synthesized from lysine and methionine in the brain, liver, and kidney (approximately 25%) and obtained via dietary intake (approximately 75%) (Fielding, Riede, Lugo, & Bellamine, 2018). The primary dietary sources of l-carnitine are red meat (140–190 mg/100 g) and milk, while plant-derived foods contain insignificant quantities of l-carnitine (Fielding et al. 2018). As shown in Table 1, l-carnitine was not detected in wild turmeric or 1-day fermented wild turmeric. l-carnitine (26.6 µg g−1) in wild turmeric was first detected after 3-day fermentation. Subsequently, it increased gradually with fermentation time (Table 1). The highest level of l-carnitine (242 µg g−1) was obtained after 7-day fermentation with R. oligosporus (Table 1). SSF with R. oligosporus led to an increase in l-carnitine content from 0.13 to 3.15 μg g−1 in quinoa after 3-day fermentation (Hur et al., 2018) and levels up to 630 μg g−1 in wild ginseng after 14-day fermentation (Lee et al., 2020). R. oligosporus hydrolyzes proteins into amino acids and small peptides (Handoyo & Morita, 2006) and synthesizes l-carnitine from lysine and methionine through four enzymatic reactions (Rousta, Ferreira, & Taherzadeh, 2021).

3.1.3. Curcumin, demethoxycurcumin, bisdemethoxycurcumin, vanillin, and ferulic acid

Curcuminoids such as curcumin, DMC, and BDMC are key bioactive compounds found in the genus Curcuma that contribute to its anti-inflammatory, anti-obesity, antioxidant, antimutagenic, anticancer, antimicrobial, antiarthritic, neuroprotective, and tyrosinase inhibitory activities (Anand et al., 2008). Thus, the effects of fermentation time on curcuminoids in wild turmeric were investigated. As shown in Table 1, curcuminoid contents increased from 4560 ± 56 to 5313 ± 45 µg g−1 curcumin, 1147 ± 7 to 1339 ± 12 µg g−1 DMC, and 444 ± 29 to 526 ± 36 µg g−1 BDMC after 1-day fermentation. Then, the concentrations of curcumin, DMC, and BDMC decreased to 4513 ± 108, 1121 ± 14, and 356 ± 14 µg g−1, respectively, after 7-day fermentation (Table 1). In addition to curcuminoids, we analyzed the concentrations of vanillin and ferulic acid in fermented wild turmeric. As shown in Table 1, the concentration of vanillin decreased from 257 ± 3 to 44 ± 4 µg g−1 after 7-day fermentation (Table 1), while the concentration of ferulic acid increased from 533 ± 34 to 576 ± 6 µg g−1 after 1-day fermentation, then decreased to 492 ± 10 µg g−1 after 3-day fermentation and increased again to 683 ± 13 µg g−1 after 7-day fermentation. Cai et al. (2014) showed that fermentation of oats with Aspergillus spp. increased the concentration of ferulic acid by up to 9-fold relative to non-fermented oats. Another study reported that the ferulic acid content of rice bran increased by up to 23.2-fold after 5-day SSF using R. oryzae (Schmidt, Goncalves, Prietto, Hackbart, & Furlong, 2014). Glycosylation, deglycosylation, methylation, sulfate conjunction, glucuronidation, and ring cleavage reactions in metabolic pathways associated with the fermentation process drove the increases and decreases of the curcuminoid, vanillin, and ferulic acid contents during fermentation.

3.1.4. Volatile compounds

The volatile compound composition of wild turmeric is responsible not only for its aromatic flavor and odor but also its biological activities including antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and anti-bacterial activities (Zhang et al., 2017). Table 2 and Figure S1 shows the volatile compounds found in non-fermented wild turmeric and in wild turmeric after 1-, 3-, 5-, and 7-day fermentation. In total, 16 volatile compounds were identified in non-fermented turmeric and 15–17 volatile compounds were identified in fermented wild turmeric. The major compounds in non-fermented and fermented wild turmeric were α-curcumene (8.1–9.1%), zingiberene (11.3–15.8%), β-sesquiphellandrene (9.4–13.7%), β-elemenone (5.1–5.9%), β-turmerone (30.4–33.0%), and α-turmerone (10.9–13.0%) (Table 2). During fermentation, γ-elemene was newly synthesized while 5-ethyl-m-xylene was not found in wild turmeric after 3-, 5-, or 7-day fermentation (Table 2). Zingiberene and β-sesquiphellandrene decreased in wild turmeric after 1-day fermentation and then increased after 3-, 5-, and 7-day fermentation (Table 2). Ylangene, α-curcumene, β-elemenone, isocurcumenol, β-turmerone, α-turmerone, 3,3,8,8-tetramethyl-tricyclo [5.1.0.0(2,4)] oct-5-ene-5-propanoic acid, 4-fluorophenyl isocyanate, and piperylene decreased with increasing fermentation time (Table 2), while β-elemene, β-bisabolene, pseudocumol, and α-atlantone were constant between non-fermented and fermented wild turmeric (Table 2). These data are in agreement with a previous report that zingiberene, β-sesquiphellandrene, and turmerone are the main volatile components of wild turmeric (C. aromatica) (Ma et al., 2016).

Table 2.

Profile of the volatile compounds in fermented wild turmeric.

Compound Retention time
Fermented turmeric (day, % of total)
0 1 3 5 7
Ethanol 2.35 N/D N/D 1.5 ± 0.1 1.1 N/D
Ylangene 12.66 4.4 ± 0.2 4.9 3.2 2.8 ± 0.1 3.4
β-elemene 12.93 0.4 N/D 0.5 0.5 0.4
γ-elemenone 13.63 N/D N/D 0.4 0.4 0.5
α-curcumene 14.47 8.5 ± 0.7 8.3 ± 0.3 8.2 ± 0.3 8.1 9.1 ± 0.5
Zingiberene 14.71 12 ± 0.5 11.3 ± 0.4 14.1 ± 0.8 14.8 ± 0.6 15.8 ± 0.2
β-bisabolene 14.92 3.4 ± 0.1 3.3 ± 0.1 3.4 ± 0.1 3.3 ± 0.1 3.6
β-sesquiphellandrene 15.25 10 ± 0.4 9.4 ± 0.2 11.7 ± 0.4 12.3 ± 0.3 13.7 ± 0.1
β-elemenone 16.77 5.9 ± 0.2 5.9 ± 0.2 5.5 ± 0.2 5.3 ± 0.1 5.1
5-Ethyl-m-xylene 17.13 0.6 0.6 N/D N/D N/D
Isocurcumenol 17.26 1.7 ± 0.3 2.1 ± 0.3 1.9 ± 0.3 2.0 ± 0.1 1.7 ± 0.2
Pseudocumol 17.74 0.9 ± 0.2 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.8
β-Turmerone 17.99 32 ± 0.8 33.0 ± 0.2 30.9 ± 0.6 31.0 ± 0.4 30.4 ± 0.4
α-Turmerone 18.61 13 ± 0.4 13.0 ± 0.8 11.8 ± 0.5 11.4 ± 0.6 10.9 ± 0.8
3,3,8,8-tetramethyl-tricyclo[5.1.0.0(2,4)] oct-5-ene-5-propanoic acid 19.23 2.8 2.99 ± 0.1 2.7 ± 0.1 2.5 ± 0.1 2.3
4-fluorophenyl isocyanate 19.41 1.5 1.6 ± 0.1 1.3 ± 0.1 1.3 ± 0.1 1.3 ± 0.1
α-atlantone 19.94 0.9 1.0 0.8 ± 0.1 0.84 0.8 ± 0.1
Piperylene 20.23 1.3 1.4 ± 0.1 1.0 ± 0.1 0.9 ± 0.1 0.7
Benzene, 1-(1,2-dimethyl-1-propenyl)-4-methoxy- 21.18 0.9 ± 0.1 1.0 ± 0.1 N/D 0.75 N/D

All experiments were carried out in triplicate, and all the data were expressed as the mean ± standard deviation.

3.2. Antioxidant potential of fermented wild turmeric

Antioxidants play an important role in preventing stress-related diseases and aging due to their close associations with active oxygen and lipid peroxidation (Al-Reza, Rahman, Sattar, Rahman, & Fida, 2010). To measure the antioxidant activity of non-fermented and fermented wild turmeric in this study, we conducted the ORAC assay involving inhibition of peroxyl radical oxidation to assess the hydrogen atom transfer mechanism, and the FRAP assay which involves reduction of the ferric ion (Fe3+)-ligand complex to a blue ferrous complex (Fe2++) to assess the single-electron transfer mechanism (Lee et al., 2020). As shown in Table 1, ORAC increased from 1010 ± 67 µM TE g−1 in wild turmeric to 1471 ± 47 µM TE g−1 in 3-day fermented wild turmeric, and then decreased to 1414 ± 67 µM TE g−1 in 7-day fermented wild turmeric. The FRAP value increased from 214.8 ± 3.0 mM Fe2+ g−1in wild turmeric to 336.4 ± 11.9 mM Fe2+ g−1 in 3-day fermented wild turmeric, then decreased to 286.2 ± 6.1 mM Fe2+ g−1 in 5-day fermented wild turmeric, and dropped further to 210.5 ± 4.9 mM Fe2+ g−1 in 7-day fermented wild turmeric. The FRAP values of fermented wild turmeric after 1-, 3-, and 5-day fermentation were 1.22–, 1.57-, and 1.33-fold higher than the value of non-fermented wild turmeric, respectively. A Pearson correlation test was performed to verify the relationship between antioxidant properties and total phenolic or flavonoid contents. The total phenolic contents of fermented wild turmeric strongly correlated with ORAC (r = 0.800) and FRAP (r = 0.874). The antioxidant activity of wild turmeric and fermented wild turmeric were attributed to the presence of phenolic compounds, flavonoid compounds, l-carnitine, and volatile oil compounds (Gulcin, 2006, Xiang et al., 2017). Therefore, increases or decreases of TPC, TFCC, l-carnitine, and volatile compounds are related to increases or decreases in the antioxidant activity of non-fermented and fermented wild turmeric.

3.3. Relationship between fermentation time and major components of wild turmeric

PCA was used to determine the effects of wild turmeric fermentation time based on qualitative indicators (TPC, TFCC, curcumin, DMC, BDMC, ferulic acid, vanillin, l-carnitine, ORAC, and FRAP). As shown in Fig. 1, the first two principal components, PC1 (63.86%) and PC2 (27.95%), were responsible for 91.81% of the total variance. One- and five-day fermented wild turmeric was distinct wild turmeric fermented for other periods, falling in the positive quadrant of PC1, and 7-day fermented wild turmeric could be differentiated from non-fermented wild turmeric by its location in the positive quadrant of PC2 (Fig. 1A). Using these indicators, 1-, 5-, and 7-day fermentation could be readily separated from non-fermented wild turmeric. The PCA plot shown in Fig. 1B indicates how the selected qualitative indicators were used to discriminate among wild turmeric fermentation times, with the length and direction of each variable (eigenvector) showing its relative contribution to the quality indicator. In PC1, 1-day fermented and non-fermented wild turmeric were characterized by high positive coefficients for curcumin (0.919), DMC (0.24), and BDMC (0.156). A high concentration of curcuminoid clearly distinguished fermentation periods of wild turmeric. The direction of the eigenvectors and negative coefficients for vanillin (−0.386) are additional distinct characteristics of non-fermented wild turmeric.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Variate statistical analyses of l-carnitine, curcumin, demethoxycurcumin (DMC), bisdemethoxycurcumin (BDMC), vanillin, ferulic acid, total phenolic content, total flavonoid-curcuminoid content, and antioxidant activities (ORAC and FRAP) of non– and fermented wild turmeric at different fermentation time: (A) PCA score plot (PC2 versus PC1) and (B) PCA biplot (PC2 against PC1).

3.4. Inhibition of lipid accumulation by fermented wild turmeric

In this study, the anti-lipid accumulation properties of wild turmeric and fermented wild turmeric were investigated based on inhibition of lipid droplet formation in 3T3-L1 cells. First, the cytotoxicity to 3T3-L1 cells of non-fermented and 1-, 3-, 5-, and 7-day fermented wild turmeric was assessed. The viability of 3T3-L1 cells treated with non-fermented or 1-, 3-, 5-, and 7-day fermented wild turmeric relative to untreated cells is shown in Fig. 2A. At 50 µg mL−1, cell viability was over 90%, and therefore we selected 50 µg mL−1 non-fermented or fermented wild turmeric for the anti-lipid accumulation test. The inhibitory effects of non-fermented and fermented wild turmeric on lipid accumulation were examined using Oil Red O staining. Fig. 2B shows lipid droplets in untreated control 3T3-L1 cells, as well as cells treated with non-fermented and 1-, 3-, 5-, and 7-day fermented wild turmeric on 7-day cell differentiation. As shown in Fig. 2B, cells treated with non-fermented and fermented wild turmeric had lower numbers of lipid droplets than control cells, which were not treated with wild turmeric. Seven-day lipid accumulation rates in 3T3-L1 cells in the control, non-fermented wild turmeric, and 1-, 3-, 5-, and 7-day fermented wild turmeric-treated groups were 100%, 67.0 ± 4.6%, 71.5 ± 3.5%, 61.8 ± 3.3%, 58.8 ± 8.8%, and 60.2 ± 6.5%, respectively (Fig. 2C). Our results are in agreement with previous research showing that the ethyl acetate fraction of C. longa root extract inhibited lipid accumulation in 3T3-L1 cells (Lee et al., 2010). The mechanism through which the ethyl acetate fraction obtained from turmeric inhibits lipid accumulation is via suppression of GLUT4 expression and stimulation of lipolysis, which involves induction of hormone-sensitive lipase and intracellular adipose triglyceride lipase (Lee et al., 2010) and leads to increased glycerol release. Curcumin, a major bioactive compound in turmeric (C. longa) and wild turmeric (C. aromatica), causes inhibition at an early state of adipocyte differentiation (<24 h) by suppressing the dominant transcriptional regulators of adipogenesis, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor protein-γ (PPARγ), and CCAAT/enhancer binding protein-α (C/EBPα) (Ferguson, Nam, & Morrison, 2016). In addition to curcumin, l-carnitine also inhibits lipid accumulation via stimulation of lipolysis and expression of genes involved in β-oxidation, including hormone-sensitive lipase, carnitine palmitoyltransferase I-a, and acyl-coenzyme A oxidase, which play roles in lipid catabolism (Lee, Lee, Lee, & Kim, 2006). Murosaki et al. (2007) demonstrated the combined effects of caffeine, soy isoflavones, arginine, and l-carnitine on triglyceride accumulation, lipolysis, and fatty acid oxidation using 3T3-L1 cells. From these results, we concluded that the decrease in lipid accumulation in 3-, 5-, and 7-day fermented wild turmeric compared to the control may be related to the l-carnitine and phenolic contents of fermented wild turmeric.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Cell viability (A), lipid-droplets accumulation inhibition (B), and lipid accumulation inhibition (C) of non-fermented wild turmeric (NF) and fermented wild turmeric by R. oligosporus turmeric after 1-, 3-, 5-, and 7-day on 3T3-L1 cells. Data are means ± standard deviation (SD) of three independent experiments.

3.5. Inhibitory effects of fermented wild turmeric on nitric oxide production

Inflammation is a biological protection mechanism of the human body against invading pathogens and other danger signals. In this study, the LPS-stimulated RAW264.7 murine macrophage cells were selected for determination of the anti-inflammatory activities of fermented wild turmeric due to their sensitivity to LPS stimulation and release of various inflammatory mediators including nitric oxide (NO), interleukin, and tumor necrosis factor-α (Lee et al., 2020). First, the cytotoxicity of non-fermented and 1-, 3-, 5-, or 7-day fermented wild turmeric on RAW264.7 murine macrophage cells was measured. The cell viabilities of RAW264.7 murine macrophage cells treated with non-fermented or 1-, 3-, 5- or 7-day fermented wild turmeric relative to untreated cells are shown in Fig. 3A. The viabilities of cells treated with non-fermented wild turmeric (84.3 ± 4.2%) increased to 93.3 ± 3.6% after 1-day fermentation, 79 ± 2.2% after 3-day fermentation, 74.3 ± 0.4% after 5-day fermentation, and returned to the level of non-fermented wild turmeric after 7-day fermentation (104 ± 3.8%) at 50 µg mL−1 (Fig. 3A). At 25 µg mL−1, cell viabilities exceeded 90%; therefore, the nitric oxide assay was performed at 25 µg mL−1. The inhibitory effects of non-fermented and 1-, 3-, 5-, and 7-day fermented wild turmeric were 53.1 ± 3.6%, 56.9 ± 1.3%, 76.7 ± 1.6%, 60.1 ± 2.7%, and 30.1 ± 5.7%, respectively (Fig. 3B). The NO inhibitory effects of 1-, 3-, and 5-day fermented wild turmeric were 1.07-, 1.44-, and 1.13-fold higher than the effect of non-fermented wild turmeric, respectively. However, this effect weakened after 7-day fermentation (Fig. 3B). The highest NO inhibitory activity for wild turmeric was obtained after 3-day fermentation. The increase in NO inhibitory activity was caused by an increase in the phenolic concentration of wild turmeric after fermentation, which led to the suppression of LPS-mediated induction of prostaglandin E2, pro-inflammatory cytokines, and nitric oxide due to reduced levels of cyclooxygenase-2 and nitric oxide synthase in RAW264.7 murine macrophage cells (Kim, Kim et al., 2016). In addition, essential oil from wild turmeric exhibits anti-inflammatory activity via downregulation of the expression of cyclooxygenase-1 and tumor necrosis factor-α (Xiang et al., 2017).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Cell viability (A) and inhibitory effect on nitric oxide production (B) of non-fermented wild turmeric (NF) and fermented wild turmeric after 1-, 3-, 5-, and 7-day on RAW 264.7 murine macrophage cells. Data are means ± standard deviation (SD) of three independent experiments.

3.6. Inhibition of melanin production in B16F10 mouse melanoma cells by fermented wild turmeric

The cytotoxicity of non-fermented and 1-, 3-, 5-, and 7-day fermented wild turmeric on B16F10 mouse melanoma cells was investigated. As shown in Fig. 4A, the viabilities of cells treated with non-fermented and 1-, 3-, 5-, and 7-day fermented wild turmeric were 45.0 ± 3.0%, 20.5 ± 3.2%, 6.6 ± 1.4%, 5.8 ± 0.6%, and 81.5 ± 0.1% at 200 µg mL−1, respectively. At 50 µg mL−1, viabilities of cells treated with non-fermented and fermented wild turmeric exceeded 90%; therefore, the melanin assay was conducted at 50 µg mL−1. The amount of melanin from B16F10 mouse melanoma cells without α-MSH treatment was set to 100%. The relative melanin content of B16F10 mouse melanoma cells treated with α-MSH was 210.6 ± 10.1%. The relative melanin contents of B16F10 mouse melanoma cells treated with α-MSH along with non-fermented wild turmeric or 1-, 3-, 5-, and 7-day fermented wild turmeric were 89.4 ± 5.6%, 90.4 ± 2.3%, 58.6 ± 3.4%, 84.5 ± 8.0%, and 92.1 ± 4.7%, respectively (Fig. 4B). Three-day fermented wild turmeric showed the strongest inhibitory effect on melanin formation in B16F10 mouse melanoma cells treated with α-MSH, while 1-, 5-, and 7-day fermented wild turmeric showed similar inhibitory effects to non-fermented wild turmeric on melanin formation in B16F10 mouse melanoma cells treated with α-MSH. High concentrations of phenolic compounds including curcuminoids and essential oil in wild turmeric play important roles in protecting skin against melanogenesis (Choi et al., 2007).

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Cell viability (A) and suppression of melanin production by fermented turmeric (B) on B16F10 mouse melanoma mouse cells. Data are means ± standard deviation (SD) of three independent experiments.

4. Conclusions

In the current study, we found that the TPC and TFCC of wild turmeric showed 1.47- and 2.25-fold increases after 3-day fermentation. Based on UPLC-MS analysis, the wild turmeric showed enhancements of up to 1.17-fold for curcumin, DMC, and BDMC after 1-day fermentation, up to 1.28-fold for ferulic acid after 7-day fermentation, and l-carnitine was newly synthesized; the concentration peaked after 7-day fermentation. In addition, the main volatile compounds in wild turmeric were maintained. The increased concentrations of l-carnitine, curcumin, demethoxycurcumin, bisdemethoxycurcumin, ferulic acid, and phenolic compounds in fermented wild turmeric contributed to the increase in antioxidant activity measured through ORAC and FRAP, anti-lipid accumulation activity in 3T3-L1 cells, inhibition of NO production in LPS-stimulated RAW264.7 murine macrophage cells, and inhibition of melanin formation in B16F10 mouse melanoma cells treated with α-MSH. These findings support the potential application of fermented wild turmeric product in the cosmeceutical and nutraceutical industries.

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Juho Lim: Investigation, Formal analysis. Thi Thanh Hanh Nguyen: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Writing – review & editing. Kunal Pal: Funding acquisition, Validation. Choon Gil Kang: Formal analysis. Chanho Park: Formal analysis. Seung Wook Kim: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition. Doman Kim: Conceptualization, Supervision, Project administration.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by a grant from the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF), funded by the Ministry of Science and ICT (2018R1D1A1B07049569, T.T.H.N., 2018R1D1A1A09083366, D.K.). This research was partially supported by the Ottogi Corporation through the Research Project.

Footnotes

Appendix A

Supplementary data to this article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fochx.2021.100198.

Contributor Information

Juho Lim, Email: juholim@snu.ac.kr.

Thi Thanh Hanh Nguyen, Email: hara2910@snu.ac.kr.

Kunal Pal, Email: kpal.nitrkl@gmail.com.

Choon Gil Kang, Email: gilkang@ottogi.co.kr.

Chanho Park, Email: chpark@ottogi.co.kr.

Seung Wook Kim, Email: kimsw@ottogi.co.kr.

Doman Kim, Email: kimdm@snu.ac.kr.

Appendix A. Supplementary data

The following are the Supplementary data to this article:

Supplementary data 1
mmc1.docx (596.7KB, docx)

References

  1. Al-Reza S.M., Rahman A., Sattar M.A., Rahman M.O., Fida H.M. Essential oil composition and antioxidant activities of Curcuma aromatica Salisb. Food and Chemical Toxicology. 2010;48(6):1757–1760. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2010.04.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Anand P., Thomas S.G., Kunnumakkara A.B., Sundaram C., Harikumar K.B., Sung B.…Aggarwal B.B. Biological activities of curcumin and its analogues (Congeners) made by man and Mother Nature. Biochemical Pharmacology. 2008;76(11):1590–1611. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2008.08.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chang C.C., Yang M.H., Wen H.M., Chern J.C. Estimation of total flavonoid content in propolis by two complementary colorimetric methods. Journal of Food and Drug Analysis. 2002;10:178–182. <Go to ISI>://WOS:000179407100009. [Google Scholar]
  4. Choi S.W., Lee S.K., Kim E.O., Oh J.H., Yoon K.S., Parris N.…Moreau R.A. Antioxidant and antimelanogenic activities of polyamine conjugates from corn bran and related hydroxycinnamic acids. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2007;55(10):3920–3925. doi: 10.1021/jf0635154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Ferguson B.S., Nam H., Morrison R.F. Curcumin inhibits 3T3-L1 preadipocyte proliferation by mechanisms involving post-transcriptional p27 regulation. Biochemistry and Biophysics Reports. 2016;5:16–21. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrep.2015.11.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Fielding R., Riede L., Lugo J., Bellamine A. L-carnitine supplementation in recovery after exercise. Nutrients. 2018;10(3):349. doi: 10.3390/nu10030349. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Gulcin I. Antioxidant and antiradical activities of L-carnitine. Life Sciences. 2006;78(8):803–811. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2005.05.103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Handoyo T., Morita N. Structural and functional properties of fermented soybean (tempeh) by using Rhizopus oligosporus. International Journal of Food Properties. 2006;9(2):347–355. doi: 10.1080/10942910500224746. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  9. Holker U., Hofer M., Lenz J. Biotechnological advantages of laboratory-scale solid-state fermentation with fungi. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2004;64(2):175–186. doi: 10.1007/s00253-003-1504-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hur J., Nguyen T.T.H., Park N., Kim J., Kim D. Characterization of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa) fermented by Rhizopus oligosporus and its bioactive properties. Amb Express. 2018;8:143. doi: 10.1186/s13568-018-0675-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Huynh N.T., Van Camp J., Smagghe G., Raes K. Improved release and metabolism of flavonoids by steered fermentation processes: A review. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2014;15:19369–19388. doi: 10.3390/ijms151119369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Jimenez-Quero A., Pollet E., Averous L., Phalip V. Optimized bioproduction of itaconic and fumaric acids based on solid-state fermentation of lignocellulosic biomass. Molecules. 2020;25:1070. doi: 10.3390/molecules25051070. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Kim H., Jeong Y., Kim J.E., Kim Y.G., Paek N.S., Kang C.H. Anti-obesity potential of Lactobacillus spp. isolated from infant feces. Biotechnology and Bioprocess Engineering. 2021;26(4):575–585. doi: 10.1007/s12257-020-0309-x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kim D.W., Lee S.M., Woo H.S., Park J.-Y., Ko B.S., Heo J.D.…Lee W.S. Chemical constituents and anti-inflammatory activity of the aerial parts of Curcuma longa. Journal of Functional Foods. 2016;26:485–493. doi: 10.1016/j.jff.2016.08.026. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kim J.H., Kim O.-K., Yoon H.-G., Park J., You Y., Kim K.…Jun W. Anti-obesity effect of extract from fermented Curcuma longa L. through regulation of adipogenesis and lipolysis pathway in high-fat diet-induced obese rats. Food & Nutrition Research. 2016;60(1):30428. doi: 10.3402/fnr.v60.30428. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kim Y., You Y., Yoon H.-G., Lee Y.-H., Kim K., Lee J.…Jun W. Hepatoprotective effects of fermented Curcuma longa L. on carbon tetrachloride-induced oxidative stress in rats. Food Chemistry. 2014;151:148–153. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2013.11.058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Kulyal P., Acharya S., Ankari A.B., Kokkiripati P.K., Tetali S.D., Raghavendra A.S. Variable secondary metabolite profiles across cultivars of Curcuma longa L. and C. aromatica Salisb. Frontiers in Pharmacology. 2021;12 doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.659546. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Lee G., Nguyen T.T.H., Lim T.Y., Lim J., Park B., Lee S.…Kim D. Fermented wild ginseng by Rhizopus oligosporus improved L-carnitine and ginsenoside contents. Molecules. 2020;25(9):2111. doi: 10.3390/molecules25092111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Lee J., Yoon H.-G., Lee Y.-H., Park J., You Y., Kim K.…Jun W. The potential effects of ethyl acetate fraction from Curcuma longa L. on lipolysis in differentiated 3T3-L1 adipocytes. Journal of Medicinal Food. 2010;13(2):364–370. doi: 10.1089/jmf.2009.1276. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Lee L.W., Cheong M.W., Curran P., Yu B., Liu S.Q. Modulation of coffee aroma via the fermentation of green coffee beans with Rhizopus oligosporus: II. Effects of different roast levels. Food Chemistry. 2016;211:925–936. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.05.073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Lee, M. S., Lee, H. J., Lee, H. S., & Kim, Y. (2006). L-carnitine stimulates lipolysis via induction of the lipolytic gene expression and suppression of the adipogenic gene expression in 3T3-L1 adipocytes. Journal of Medicinal Food, 9, 468-473. https://doi.org/DOI 10.1089/jmf.2006.9.468. [DOI] [PubMed]
  22. Li S. Chemical composition and product quality control of turmeric (Curcuma longa L.) Pharmaceutical Crops. 2011;5(1):28–54. doi: 10.2174/2210290601102010028. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  23. Ma J.-W., Tsao T.-Y., Hsi Y.-T., Lin Y.-C., Chen Y., Chen Y.…Way T.-D. Essential oil of Curcuma aromatica induces apoptosis in human non-small-cell lung carcinoma cells. Journal of Functional Foods. 2016;22:101–112. doi: 10.1016/j.jff.2016.01.019. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  24. Manal H.S., Manal S.A. A new acylated luteolin glycoside from Curcuma Longa L. and free radical scavenging potential of its extracts. Journal of Medicinal Plants Research. 2014;8(1):1–5. doi: 10.5897/JMPR10.5897/JMPR2013.5301. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  25. McCue P., Shetty K. Role of carbohydrate-cleaving enzymes in phenolic antioxidant mobilization from whole soybean fermented with Rhizopus oligosporus. Food Biotechnology. 2003;17(1):27–37. doi: 10.1081/FBT-120019982. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  26. Mohamed S.A., Saleh R.M., Kabli S.A., Al-Garni S.M. Influence of solid state fermentation by Trichoderma spp. on solubility, phenolic content, antioxidant, and antimicrobial activities of commercial turmeric. Bioscience Biotechnology and Biochemistry. 2016;80:920–928. doi: 10.1080/09168451.2015.1136879. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Murosaki S., Lee T.R., Muroyama K., Shin E.S., Cho S.Y., Yamamoto Y., Lee S.J. A combination of caffeine, arginine, soy isoflavones, and L-carnitine enhances both lipolysis and fatty acid oxidation in 3T3-L1 and HepG2 cells in vitro and in KK mice in vivo. Journal of Nutrition. 2007;137:2252–2257. doi: 10.1093/jn/137.10.2252. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Ou B., Hampsch-Woodill M., Prior R.L. Development and validation of an improved oxygen radical absorbance capacity assay using fluorescein as the fluorescent probe. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2001;49(10):4619–4626. doi: 10.1021/jf010586o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Park N., Lee T.K., Nguyen T.T.H., An E.B., Kim N.M., You Y.H.…Kim D. The effect of fermented buckwheat on producing L-carnitine- and gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA)-enriched designer eggs. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. 2017;97:2891–2897. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.8123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Park N., Nguyen T.T.H., Lee G.H., Jin S.N., Kwak S.H., Lee T.K.…Kim D. Composition and biochemical properties of L-carnitine fortified Makgeolli brewed by using fermented buckwheat. Food Science & Nutrition. 2018;6:2293–2300. doi: 10.1002/fsn3.803. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Priyadarsini K.I. Chemical and structural features influencing the biological activity of curcumin. Current Pharmaceutical Design. 2013;19:2093–2100. doi: 10.2174/1381612811319110010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Rajkumari S., Sanatombi K. Nutritional value, phytochemical composition, and biological activities of edible Curcuma species: A review. International Journal of Food Properties. 2018;20(sup3):S2668–S2687. doi: 10.1080/10942912.2017.1387556. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  33. Rousta N., Ferreira J.A., Taherzadeh M.J. Production of L-carnitine-enriched edible filamentous fungal biomass through submerged cultivation. Bioengineered. 2021;12(1):358–368. doi: 10.1080/21655979.2020.1863618. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Sala A., Barrena R., Artola A., Sánchez A. Current developments in the production of fungal biological control agents by solid-state fermentation using organic solid waste. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology. 2019;49(8):655–694. doi: 10.1080/10643389.2018.1557497. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  35. Schmidt C.G., Goncalves L.M., Prietto L., Hackbart H.S., Furlong E.B. Antioxidant activity and enzyme inhibition of phenolic acids from fermented rice bran with fungus Rizhopus oryzae. Food Chemistry. 2014;146:371–377. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2013.09.101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Shabana M.H., Shahy E.M, Taha M.M, Mahdy G.M, Mahmoud M.H. Phytoconstituents from Curcuma longa L. aqueous ethanol extract and its immunomodulatory effect on diabetic infected rats. Egyptian Pharmaceutical Journal. 2015;14(1):36–43. doi: 10.4103/1687-4315.154713. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  37. Xiang H.P., Zhang L.Y., Xi L., Yang Y., Wang X.W., Lei D.H.…Liu X.X. Phytochernical profiles and bioactivities of essential oils extracted from seven Curcuma herbs. Industrial Crops and Products. 2018;111:298–305. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2017.10.035. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  38. Xiang H.P., Zhang L.Y., Yang Z.W., Chen F., Zheng X., Liu X.X. Chemical compositions, antioxidative, antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory and antitumor activities of Curcuma aromatica Salisb. essential oils. Industrial Crops and Products. 2017;108:6–16. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2017.05.058. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  39. Xu X., Jeong S.-M., Lee J.-E., Kang W.-S., Ryu S.-H., Byun E.-B.…Ahn D.-H. Characterization and anti-inflammatory effects of gamma-irradiation on undaria pinnatifida root water extracts. Biotechnology and Bioprocess Engineering. 2021;26(4):606–611. doi: 10.1007/s12257-020-0325-x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  40. Zhang L., Yang Z., Wei J., Su P., Pan W., Zheng X.i.…Du Z. Essential oil composition and bioactivity variation in wild-growing populations of Curcuma phaeocaulis Valeton collected from China. Industrial Crops and Products. 2017;103:274–282. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2017.04.019. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary data 1
mmc1.docx (596.7KB, docx)

Articles from Food Chemistry: X are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES