Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 31;64(2):274–290. doi: 10.5187/jast.2022.e21

Table 5. Effect of FA and CTL on meat quality of the hair lambs.

Item FA (ppm)1) CTL (%)2) SEM p-value
0 300 0 1 FA CTL FA × CTL
pH 24 h 5.50 5.49 5.53 5.45 0.08 0.923 0.391 0.317
Final pH 6.01 5.76 5.86 5.92 0.142 0.116 0.686 0.095
WHC (%) 79.52 81.41 80.79 80.14 1.30 0.183 0.639 0.612
Color variables
 L* 38.63 38.09 37.43 39.28 0.804 0.527 0.041 0.703
 a* 17.83 17.54 16.91 18.46 0.642 0.668 0.034 0.178
 b* 8.83 8.34 7.93 9.24 0.649 0.482 0.070 0.167
 Chroma (C*) 19.91 19.45 18.70 20.66 0.837 0.604 0.038 0.160
 Hue angle (H*) 26.22 25.09 24.93 26.39 1.07 0.328 0.209 0.265
 Cooking loss (%) 15.97 17.21 17.30 15.87 1.98 0.558 0.500 0.456
 WBSF (kg) 7.36 6.80 7.60 6.56 0.850 0.539 0.258 0.623
1)

Lambs fed 0 or 300 ppm of ferulic acid through the 40-d feeding trial.

2)

Lambs fed 0 or 1% of clinoptilolite through the 40-d feeding.

FA, ferulic acid; CTL, clinoptilolite; WHC, water-holding capacity; WBSF, Warner-Bratzler shear force.