Skip to main content
. 2022 Apr 26;22:123. doi: 10.1186/s12874-022-01552-6

Table 2.

Performance for scenario I with true intervention effect of βt=-0.264

Event Generation model Number of steps (clusters)
AG model PWP-TT model PWP-GT model
Bias MSE CP Bias MSE CP Bias MSE CP
Poisson 2 0.0267 0.0034 0.937 0.0006 0.0032 0.959 0.0393 0.0047 0.868
4 0.0259 0.0036 0.941 0.0013 0.0036 0.948 0.0386 0.0051 0.894
5 0.0266 0.0040 0.933 0.0021 0.0040 0.940 0.0380 0.0054 0.899
8 0.0255 0.0041 0.943 0.0011 0.0041 0.938 0.0397 0.0056 0.896
10 0.0251 0.0042 0.936 0.0016 0.0042 0.943 0.0376 0.0057 0.897
20 0.0259 0.0042 0.938 0.0020 0.0042 0.949 0.0363 0.0057 0.912
Mixed-Poisson 2 0.0283 0.0035 0.930 0.0085 0.0032 0.947 0.0572 0.0065 0.785
4 0.0284 0.0039 0.923 0.0099 0.0037 0.936 0.0563 0.0068 0.826
5 0.0290 0.0041 0.927 0.0106 0.0039 0.938 0.0543 0.0067 0.844
8 0.0282 0.0043 0.932 0.0097 0.0041 0.943 0.0547 0.0070 0.846
10 0.0254 0.0042 0.937 0.0075 0.0042 0.947 0.0534 0.0071 0.845
20 0.0281 0.0046 0.920 0.0097 0.0045 0.938 0.0530 0.0073 0.856
Weibull (constant) 2 0.0462 0.0052 0.870 0.0424 0.0050 0.882 0.0016 0.0032 0.944
4 0.0546 0.0065 0.848 0.0509 0.0062 0.867 0.0003 0.0037 0.945
5 0.0567 0.0067 0.858 0.0529 0.0065 0.864 0.0032 0.0037 0.949
8 0.0563 0.0071 0.849 0.0522 0.0068 0.863 0.0016 0.0043 0.934
10 0.0566 0.0072 0.842 0.0522 0.0069 0.860 0.0019 0.0042 0.945
20 0.0553 0.0070 0.869 0.0496 0.0067 0.884 0.0004 0.0044 0.949
Weibull (change) 2 0.1229 0.0162 0.100 0.0253 0.0026 0.897 -0.0014 0.0019 0.950
4 0.1221 0.0162 0.157 0.0299 0.0032 0.892 -0.0019 0.0021 0.963
5 0.1247 0.0168 0.162 0.0328 0.0033 0.896 -0.0004 0.0022 0.955
8 0.1240 0.0167 0.171 0.0330 0.0035 0.902 -0.0014 0.0024 0.954
10 0.1250 0.0171 0.191 0.0348 0.0038 0.888 0.0010 0.0025 0.956
20 0.1237 0.0169 0.222 0.0334 0.0038 0.901 -0.0012 0.0026 0.949

AG Andersen-Gill, PWP-TT Prentice-Williams-Peterson Total-Time, PWP-GT Prentice-Williams-Peterson Gap-Time, MSE Mean square error, CP Coverage probability