Table 7.
Analysis results of actual example (intervention indicator only)
| Dealing with clusters | Statistical model | Parameter Estimates | Standard Error | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR [95%CI] | p-value | ||||
| With stratification by clusters | AG | 0.033 | 0.122 | 1.034 [0.814, 1.314] | 0.785 |
| PWP-TT | -0.061 | 0.123 | 0.941 [0.739, 1.198] | 0.621 | |
| PWP-GT | 0.054 | 0.117 | 1.056 [0.840, 1.327] | 0.641 | |
| Without stratification by clusters | AG | 0.096 | 0.094 | 1.102 [0.915, 1.326] | 0.306 |
| PWP-TT | 0.040 | 0.095 | 1.041 [0.863, 1.254] | 0.676 | |
| PWP-GT | 0.087 | 0.091 | 1.090 [0.912, 1.304] | 0.360 |
AG Andersen-Gill, PWP-TT Prentice-Williams-Peterson Total-Time, PWP-GT Prentice-Williams-Peterson Gap-Time, HR Hazard ratio, CI Confidence interval