Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 4;10(1):coac009. doi: 10.1093/conphys/coac009

Table 2.

Model table including model descriptions and model structures for each of three categories of variables hypothesized to explain fGCM variation in the restored Missouri elk (C. canadensis) population

Category Model description Model structure
Translocation Null fGCM ~ 1
Day of year fGCM ~ sin.day + cos.day
Day of year + proportion translocated in year fGCM ~ sin.day + cos.day + prop.trans
Day of year + days from most recent release fGCM ~ sin.day + cos.day + df.release
Day of year + year of restoration fGCM ~ sin.day + cos.day + restor.yr
Climate Null fGCM ~ 1
Day of year fGCM ~ sin.day + cos.day
Day of year + avg daily precipitation fGCM ~ sin.day + cos.day + d.prcp
Day of year + avg daily temperature fGCM ~ sin.day + cos.day + d.temp
Day of year + avg monthly precipitation fGCM ~ sin.day + cos.day + m.prcp
Day of year + avg monthly temperature fGCM ~ sin.day + cos.day + m.temp
Disturbance Null fGCM ~ 1
Day of year fGCM ~ sin.day + cos.day
Day of year + deer hunt in 3-day window fGCM ~ sin.day + cos.day + hunt.3d
Day of year + deer hunt in 5-day window fGCM ~ sin.day + cos.day + hunt.5d
Day of year + deer hunt in 10-day window fGCM ~ sin.day + cos.day + hunt.10d
Day of year + deer hunt type in 3-day window fGCM ~ sin.day + cos.day + huntyp.3d
Day of year + deer hunt type in 5-day window fGCM ~ sin.day + cos.day + huntyp.5d
Day of year + deer hunt type in 10-day window fGCM ~ sin.day + cos.day + huntyp.10d