Skip to main content
. 2022 Apr 26;22:832. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13153-5

Table 4.

Relationship-level characteristics of dyads and individually represented HIV-serodiscordant relationships in PP1

Relationship characteristic Total relationships (N = 460)
N (%)
Dyad
(n = 153)
n (%)
Individual representative
(n = 307)
n (%)
p-value
Language (survey completion) Unavailable Unavailable
 Both English 138 (90.2)
 Both French 9 (5.9)
 English and French 6 (3.9)
Partner gender 0.062
 Male-male 221 (48.6) 85 (55.6) 136 (44.3)
 Male-female 213 (46.3) 62 (40.5) 151 (49.2)
 Other 26 (5.7) 6 (3.9) 20 (6.5)
Age difference between partners (HIV-positive – HIV-negative) 435 153 282 0.268
 Mean (SD) −0.3 (9.8) 0.4 (9.5) − 0.7 (9.9)
 Median (range) 0 (− 33, 34) 0 (− 29, 34) 0 (− 33, 34)
Race Unavailable Unavailable
 Both partners White 83 (54.2)
 Both partners not White 20 (13.1)
 Mixed 46 (30.1)
 One or both partners missing 4 (2.6)
Region 0.339
 British Columbia 49 (10.7) 20 (13.1) 29 (9.4)
 Prairies 65 (14.1) 20 (13.1) 45 (14.7)
 Ontario 265 (57.6) 84 (54.9) 181 (59.0)
 Quebec 51 (11.1) 15 (9.8) 36 (11.7)
 Atlantic 25 (5.4) 12 (7.8) 13 (4.2)
 Split across 2 regions 2 (0.4) 2 (1.3) 0 (0)
 Missing 3 (0.7) 0 3 (1)
HIV diagnosis or relationship first Unavailable Unavailable
 HIV diagnosis first 102 (66.7)
 Relationship first 38 (24.8)
 Same time 13 (8.5)
Relationship duration (years) 460 153 307 0.002
 Mean (SD) 6.8 (8.0) 8.5 (8.3) 6 (7.7)
 Median (range) 4 (0, 40) 5 (0, 40) 3 (0, 40)
HIV-positive partner virally suppressedb 0.043
 Yes 367 (79.8) 132 (86.3) 235 (76.5)
 No 43 (9.3) 11 (7.2) 32 (10.4)
 Don’t know 31 (6.7) 6 (3.9) 25 (8.1)
 Missing 19 (4.1) 4 (2.6) 15 (4.9)
Relationship Satisfaction – mean of partnersc 458 153 305 < 0.001
 Mean (SD) 4.1 (0.8) 4.4 (0.5) 4 (0.9)
 Median (range) 4.3 (1, 5) 4.4 (2.4, 5) 4.1 (1, 5)
Sexual Satisfaction – mean of partnersc 452 153 299 0.799
 Mean (SD) 3.7 (1.1) 3.8 (1) 3.7 (1.2)
 Median (Range) 4 (1, 5) 4 (1, 5) 4 (1, 5)

Abbreviations: PP1 Positive Plus One Study

a Unavailable for couples with only one participating partner

b For dyads, we used the response of the HIV positive partner where it was divergent from the negative partner’s response. HIV-positive participants in a past relationship who reported being suppressed at any time in the relationship were classified as suppressed while HIV-positive past-relationship participants who reported that they were virally suppressed “none of the time” during the relationship were counted as not suppressed

c Possible range 1–5; (1 = low, 5 = high)