Table 2.
linear correlations and differences according to Bland–Altman analysis between echoPIV and peak PW Doppler velocities, and respectively peak of the mean tracing of PW Doppler velocities
| echoPIV versus PW Doppler maximal velocity | Linear correlation | Bland-Altmann | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EchoPIV | PW Doppler | R2 | P for correlation | Bias | LOA | |
| Inflow [m/s] | 0.70 ± 0.27 | 0.84 ± 0.29 | 0.77 | < 0.001 | 0.19 (27%) | -0.08 to 0.46 |
| Outflow [m/s] | 0.61 ± 0.22 | 0.85 ± 0.21 | 0.54 | 0.003 | 0.28 (45%) | -0.03 to 0.59 |
| echoPIV versus PW Doppler mean velocity | EchoPIV | PW Doppler | R2 | P for correlation | Bias | LOA |
| Inflow [m/s] | 0.7 ± 0.27 | 0.77 ± 0.26 | 0.80 | < 0.001 | 0.12 (17%) | -0.11 to 0.35 |
| Outflow [m/s] | 0.61 ± 0.22 | 0.79 ± 0.21 | 0.44 | 0.009 | 0.22 (36%) | -0.11 to 0.55 |
HFR echoPIV also detected intracavitary jets that were not directly visible on the corresponding apical long axis colour Doppler classical echocardiography. Furthermore, those functional phenomena could be related to anatomical abnormalities seen in the associated CCT/CMR images