Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 21;13(2):e02759-21. doi: 10.1128/mbio.02759-21

TABLE 2.

Geographic distribution of CRAb isolates by study site

Sublineage No. (%)
Total (n = 115) Cleveland (n = 66) Pittsburgh (n = 25) Houston (n = 21) Chapel Hill (n = 3)
CC2A 13 (11) 7 (11) None 6 (29) None
CC2B 15 (13) 1 (2) 13 (52) None 1 (33)
CC2C 60 (52) 46 (70) 9 (36) 4 (19) 1 (33)
ST499Pas 18 (16) 11 (17) None 7 (33) None
Other ST 9 (8) 1 (2) 3 (12) 4 (19) 1 (33)