Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 22;7:e00087. doi: 10.1016/j.ohx.2019.e00087

Table 1.

The performance of the proposed HSI device and the more comparable HSI devices found in the literature. A cell is blank when the parameter is not available in its related paper. |λ| is the number of wavebands. The column One Shot has a tick mark when the HSI device extracts a hypercube from a single digital image. The OM column has a cross mark when the HSI device posses optomechanical parts or, it uses the whisk-broom technique to acquire hypercubes. The column SW has a tick mark when the authors deployed the required software to calibrate and obtain hypercubes.

Device Cost
US$
Weight
g
Size
cm
Spectral
Range
nm
Spatial
Resolution
px
|λ| One
Shot
OM SW
Proposed 500 300 18 × 9 × 7 420–950 116 × 110 315 X X X
2018 [7] 626 306 15 × 6 × 5 435–733 212 X X X
2016 [8] 10,000 340–820 18 × 1 50 X X X
2015 [9] 1,000 1,200 340–750 30 X X X
2012 [10] 2,000 1,500 15 × 12 × 25 410–700 120 × 120 54 X
2011 [11] 2,000 400–1,000 800 × 1 205 X X X
2010 [12] 450–650 285 × 285 60 X
2008 [13] 460–880 400 × 400 17 X
2007 [14] 950 450–700 64 × 64 50 X