Evaluation of intra-day and inter-day accuracy and precision of the proposed method in case of different serum samplesa.
| Serum samples | Standard method | Proposed method | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intra-day accuracy and precision (n = 3) | Inter-day accuracy and precision (n = 3) | ||||||||
| Average | Average reading | ±CL | RE (%) | RSD (%) | Average reading | ±CL | RE (%) | RSD (%) | |
| Patient (1) | 10 | 10.2 | ±0.0135 | 2.00 | 0.98 | 10.5 | ±0.0133 | 5.00 | 0.95 |
| Patient (2) | 23 | 22.9 | ±0.0090 | 0.43 | 0.44 | 22.1 | ±0.0092 | 3.91 | 0.45 |
| Patient (3) | 27 | 27.1 | ±0.0083 | 0.37 | 0.37 | 28 | ±0.0081 | 3.70 | 0.36 |
| Patient (4) | 15 | 15.5 | ±0.0109 | 3.33 | 0.65 | 14.5 | ±0.0113 | 3.33 | 0.69 |
| Patient (5) | 18 | 18.3 | ±0.0101 | 1.67 | 0.55 | 18 | ±0.0101 | 0.00 | 0.56 |
| Patient (6) | 99 | 98.8 | ±0.0043 | 0.20 | 1.00 | 100 | ±0.0043 | 1.01 | 1.00 |
| Patient (7) | 78 | 78.0 | ±0.0049 | 0.00 | 1.30 | 79 | ±0.0048 | 1.28 | 1.31 |
| Patient (8) | 130 | 130.6 | ±0.0038 | 0.46 | 0.80 | 129 | ±0.0038 | 0.77 | 0.80 |
| Patient (9) | 210 | 210.2 | ±0.0030 | 0.10 | 0.50 | 212 | ±0.0030 | 0.95 | 0.50 |
| Patient (10) | 105 | 105.4 | ±0.0042 | 0.38 | 0.90 | 103 | ±0.0042 | 1.90 | 1.00 |
| Patient (11) | 222 | 221.7 | ±0.0029 | 0.14 | 0.50 | 225 | ±0.0043 | 1.96 | 0.10 |
| Patient (12) | 102 | 102.3 | ±0.0043 | 0.29 | 0.10 | 100 | ±0.0029 | 1.35 | 0.40 |
RE: percent relative error, RSD (%): relative standard deviation and CL: confidence limits were calculated from: CL = ±tS/√n (the tabulated value of t is 4.303, at the 95% confidence level; S = standard deviation and n = number of measurements).