Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 18;3(1):50–58. doi: 10.1089/phage.2021.0011

Table 1.

Bacterial Isolates Used in This Study

Isolate Species Genome length (bp) %GC MEM CZA Used for phage screening CRISPR ± Prophages References
607 Enterobacter cloacae 4,580,599 55.6 S S Yes 2 This study
608 E. cloacae 4,862,673 55.5 S S Yes + 4 This study
609 Enterobacter dissolvens 5,184,790 54.8 S S Yes 4 This study
649 E. cloacae 4,909,029 55.0 S S Yes + 6 This study
955 Klebsiella aerogenes 5,152,230 55.1 R S Yes + 3 This study
971 E. cloacae 4,887,763 55.3 S S Yes 5 This study
973 E. cloacae 4,733,519 55.5 S S Yes + 3 This study
1665 Enterobacter kobei 5,399,822 54.7 S S Yes 12 This study
Surv186 E. cloacae 4,568,799 55.7 I S Yes 1 33
Surv196 E. cloacae 4,623,312 55.7 R R No 1 33
Ent634 E. cloacae 4,957,562 55.4 S S Yes + 5 33
Ent630 E. cloacae 4,958,359 55.4 R R No + 5 33

CRISPR, clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats; CZA, ceftazidime–avibactam; MEM, meropenem; S/I/R, sensitive/intermediate/resistant according to CLSI criteria.12