Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 3;48(5):786–803. doi: 10.1080/02664763.2020.1748581

Table 4. Comparisons of the ZIP, ZINB, and ZICMP models with different dependence structures.

Marginal Copula Order AICa BICb RMSPEc
ZIP Gaussian 1 435.55 945.76 1.59
  Frank 1 434.11 942.88 1.58
  Gumbel 1 438.32 951.32 1.60
  ref.Gumbel 1 433.87 942.41 1.57
  Plackett 1 435.21 945.09 1.58
  Gaussian 2 433.85 950.22 1.56
  PSLT/Frank 2 431.25 948.87 1.56
  LSLT/Frank 2 433.77 953.90 1.55
  PSLT/Gumbel 2 418.46 923.28 1.62
ZINB Gaussian 1 425.86 938.08 1.59
  Frank 1 424.54 935.45 1.59
  Gumbel 1 428.20 942.77 1.60
  ref.Gumbel 1 424.15 934.67 1.58
  Plackett 1 425.5 937.38 1.59
  Gaussian 2 424.06 942.34 1.56
  PSLT/Frank 2 417.00 928.23 1.57
  LSLT/Frank 2 423.67 941.56 1.57
  PSLT/Gumbel 2 413.05 920.32 1.63
ZICMP Gaussian 1 477.10 1040.56 1.91
  Frank 1 475.06 1036.49 1.88
  Gumbel 1 473.49 1033.3 1.79
  ref.Gumbel 1 473.73 1033.84 1.87
  Plackett 1 469.06 1024.48 1.77
  Gaussian 2 449.97 994.16 1.72
  PSLT/Frank 2 457.44 1009.11 1.80
  LSLT/Frank 2 450.91 996.04 1.77
  PSLT/Gumbel 2 455.12 1004.47 1.83
Poisson Frank 1 495.90 1038.9 1.76
  ref.Gumbel 1 488.16 1023.43 1.75
NB Frank 1 446.28 947.52 2.32
  ref.Gumbel 1 445.69 946.35 2.29

a AIC =l(ϑˆ;y)r,

b BIC =2l(ϑˆ;y)+rlogn.

c RMSPE={1/npt=1+pn[ytEˆ(Yt|Yt1=yt1,,Ytp=ytp;ϑˆ)]2}1/2.