Table 5.

Simulation results for peptide [8,17] simulation study for designs given in Table 4. Percentages given in the body of this table correspond to total sample sizes of $n=180$ (left) and $n=360$ (right).

Design	Percent NA/5000	Proportion $\widehat{var}(\hat{\beta })>C_1$	Proportion $\widehat{var}({\hat{\gamma }}_A)>C_2$	Proportion $\widehat{var}(\hat{\rho })>C_3$	Proportion $|{\mathit{M}}^{-1}|>C_4$
1 (original)	7.2/1.2	0.1134/0.0356	0.3899/0.3780	0.4362/0.3993	0.3631/0.2916
2 (R/D)	2.8/0.2	0.0138/0.0006	0.1523/0.0976	0.3029/0.2321	0.0671/0.0168
3 (R/ $D(0.75)$)	3.0/0.4	0.4049/0.2891	0.1071/0.0462	0.3436/0.2710	0.1584/0.0665
4 (R/geom.)	2.7/0.3	0.0136/0.0004	0.1441/0.0931	0.3148/0.2285	0.0773/0.0167
5 (R/uniform)	4.0/0.3	0.1212/0.0393	0.2606/0.1952	0.3149/0.2661	0.0771/0.0199
6 (R/slope4)	3.7/0.5	0.0052/0.0002	0.2233/0.1725	0.3223/0.2537	0.0636/0.0161
7 (R/scale4)	3.2/0.7	0.0494/0.0089	0.1780/0.1269	0.3259/0.2638	0.0762/0.0213
8 (R/SC2point)	3.0/0.2	0.0080/0.0004	0.1676/0.0933	0.2972/0.2232	0.0622/0.0152
9 (D/2pt/curve)	2.3/0.1	0/0	0.1624/0.0891	0.2416/0.1666	0.0266/0.0034