Table 4. Comparison of model fit of ZIP-W , ZIP-W , ZIP-O and ZIP-O in terms of average AIC and BIC across 200 simulated datasets generated from the model ZIP-W .
n | ZIP-W | ZIP-W | ZIP-O | ZIP-O |
---|---|---|---|---|
AIC | ||||
250 | 976.520 | 1162.257 | 2064.654 | 1732.514 |
500 | 1900.825 | 2288.361 | 4130.966 | 3448.865 |
1000 | 3887.104 | 4671.542 | 8960.393 | 7597.910 |
BIC | ||||
250 | 1004.692 | 1186.908 | 2085.782 | 1753.643 |
500 | 1934.542 | 2317.863 | 4156.254 | 3474.153 |
1000 | 3926.366 | 4705.896 | 8989.840 | 7627.356 |