Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 25;49(1):1–23. doi: 10.1080/02664763.2020.1796943

Table 4. Comparison of model fit of ZIP-W b, ZIP-W c, ZIP-O b and ZIP-O c in terms of average AIC and BIC across 200 simulated datasets generated from the model ZIP-W b.

n ZIP-W b ZIP-W c ZIP-O b ZIP-O c
  AIC
250 976.520 1162.257 2064.654 1732.514
500 1900.825 2288.361 4130.966 3448.865
1000 3887.104 4671.542 8960.393 7597.910
  BIC
250 1004.692 1186.908 2085.782 1753.643
500 1934.542 2317.863 4156.254 3474.153
1000 3926.366 4705.896 8989.840 7627.356