Skip to main content
. 2022 Apr 27;21:100. doi: 10.1186/s12912-022-00878-2

Table 1.

Differences of the Learning Effects by Time Point and by Treatment Order of VS and HFS (N = 52)

Time/Group Baseline (T0) After 1st treatment (T1) After 2nd Treatment (T2) Crossover effect (T2-T1)
Variables (possible range) Group1 (n = 26) Group2 (n = 26) z (p) Group1 (n = 26) Group2 (n = 26) z (p) Group1 (n = 26) Group2 (n = 26) Group1 (n = 26) Group2 (n = 26) z (p)
Median (IQR) Median (IQR) Median (IQR) Median (IQR)
Problem solving process (25 ~ 125) 84.5 (17.50) 78.5 (10.00) 1.01 (.314) 92.5 (12.75) 84.5 (10.00) 2.76 (.006) 98.0 (11.25) 93.0 (10.00) 5.5 (11.00) 9.5 (7.25) -1.30 (.193)
Clinical reasoning (15 ~ 75) 48.0 (9.50) 48.5 (10.00) 0.35 (.728) 56.0 (7.00) 52.5 (8.25) 2.16 (.031) 60.5 (5.50) 57.0 (4.50) 5.0 (7.25) 5.0 (6.50) 0.00 (1.000)
Reflective thinking (16 ~ 64) NA NA NA 52.0 (7.75) 56.0 (9.25) -1.05 (.295) 60.0 (6.25) 57.0 (10.00) 6.0 (5.25) 1.5 (5.00) 3.52 (< .001)
Satisfaction on practicum (16 ~ 64) NA NA NA 22.5 (4.25) 24.0 (5.00) -2.00 (.842) 25.0 (2.00) 23.0 (5.00) 1.0 (3.00) 0.0 (1.50) 1.81 (.070)
Self-confidence (8 ~ 40) NA NA NA 33.0 (5.25) 33.0 (4.00) 0.35 (.726) 37.5 (4.00) 34.0 (4.25) 3.0 (6.25) 0.5 (2.75) 2.47 (.013)

VS Virtual simulation, HFS High-fidelity simulation

Group1: VS then HFS, Group2: HFS then VS

IQR Interquartile range