Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 7;4(2):e599–e605. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2021.11.022

Table 2.

Game Use and Performance One Year Before and After Labral Repair

Time Point Labrum (n = 29) Control (n = 55)
GP Pre 66.2 ± 20.9 62.1 ± 22.7
Post 56.6 ± 23.8 64.0 ± 25.9
P value .36 .51
TOI/GP Pre 16.5 ± 4.6 16.0 ± 4.3
Post 15.8 ± 4.7 16.5 ± 3.9
P value .187 .48
Goals per 60 Pre 0.8 ± 0.5 0.2 ± 0.2
Post 0.6 ± 0.4 0.2 ± 0.2
P value .013 .97
Assists per 60 Pre 1.1 ± 0.6 0.3 ± 0.2
Post 0.9 ± 0.5 0.3 ± 0.2
P value .11 .49
Points per 60 Pre 2.0 ± 0.9 0.5 ± 0.4
Post 1.5 ± 0.9 1.6 ± 7.8
P value .001 .65
Shooting percentage Pre 10.5 ± 5.2 9.6 ± 4.3
Post 8.5 ± 5.8 10.2 ± 5.9
P value .02 .74
Corsi percentage Pre 49.4 ± 3.9 49.9 ± 4.5
Post 49.6 ± 3.7 51.2 ± 4.3
P value .68 .09
Fenwick percentage Pre 49.5 ± 3.8 50.0 ± 4.2
Post 49.7 ± 3.8 51.1 ± 4.0
P value .7 .15
PDO Pre 99.9 ± 3.8 100.5 ± 4.8
Post 98.9 ± 3.8 100.5 ± 3.3
P value .51 .71

NOTE. Continuous variables are presented using adjusted mean ± standard error.

Significant P values (<.05) are indicated by bold text.

P values compare pre- vs post-values within the same group.

assists per 60, assists per 60 minutes; goals per 60, goals per 60 minutes; GP, games played; PDO, shooting plus save percentage; points per 60, points per 60 minutes; TOI/GP, time on ice per games played.