Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 7;4(2):e599–e605. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2021.11.022

Table 3.

Game Use and Performance One Year Before and Three Years After Labral Repair

Time Point Labrum (n = 27) Control (n = 55)
GP Pre 66.2 ± 20.9 62.1 ± 22.7
Post 55.3 ± 25.6 64.6 ± 20.4
P value .07 .53
TOI/GP Pre 16.5 ± 4.6 16.0 ± 4.3
Post 15.8 ± 3.7 16.5 ± 3.6
P value .04 .79
Goals per 60 Pre 0.8 ± 0.5 0.2 ± 0.2
Post 0.6 ± 0.4 0.2 ± 0.2
P value .01 .58
Assists per 60 Pre 1.1 ± 0.6 0.3 ± 0.2
Post 1.0 ± 0.5 0.3 ± 0.2
P value .12 .76
Points per 60 Pre 2.0 ± 0.9 0.5 ± 0.4
Post 1.7 ± 0.8 0.6 ± 0.4
P value .18 .66
Shooting percentage 1 y preindex Pre 10.5 ± 5.2 9.6 ± 4.3
Post 8.5 ± 4.7 9.2 ± 5.2
P value .04 .2
Corsi percentage Pre 49.4 ± 3.9 49.9 ± 4.5
Post 49.4 ± 3.7 51.7 ± 3.6
P value .81 .28
Fenwick percentage Pre 49.5 ± 3.8 50.0 ± 4.2
Post 49.2 ± 4.7 51.3 ± 4.0
P value .96 .5
PDO Pre 99.9 ± 3.8 100.5 ± 4.8
Post 100.0 ± 2.4 99.8 ± 3.0
P value .72 .11

NOTE. Continuous variables are presented using adjusted mean ± standard error.

P values with significance (≤.05) are indicated by bold text

P values compare pre vs post values within the same group.

assists per 60, assists per 60 minutes; goals per 60, goals per 60 minutes; GP, games played; PDO, shooting plus save percentage; points per 60, points per 60 minutes; TOI/GP, time on ice per games played.