Skip to main content
. 2022 Apr 26;12:6792. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-10729-4

Table 2.

A comparison study between the proposed MTM sensor and others was reported in the literature.

References Material sensing Operating frequency (GHz) Dielectric constant (DK) value Shift of fr (MHz) Amplitude change of S11 (dB) Q-factor FOM
20 Transformer oil 2–6 2.7 for clean and 2.9 for waste transformer oil 40 − 1.5 60 34
23 Oil 1–8 2.74 for clean oil and 2.87 for waste oil 63 − 0.9 90 32
27 Diesel 8–12 2.72 for branded diesel and 2.48 for unbranded diesel 60 − 2.5 110 37
28 Diesel 8–12 2.73 for branded and 2.47 for unbranded diesel 120 − 3.2 105 41
36 Transformer oil 8–12 2.8 for clean and 2.7 for waste transformer oil 70 − 4.5 100 48
Oil 8–12 2.78 for olive oil and 2.6 for corn oil 50 − 0.8
37 Diesel 10–12 2.07 for branded and 2.68 for unbranded diesel 72 − 4 90 52
Gasoline 10–11 2.43 for branded and 2.52 for unbranded gasoline 12 − 6
38 Diesel 8–12 2.08 for pure and 2.7 for adulterated diesel 100 − 10 95 38
44 Gasoline 8–12 2.43 for branded and 2.51 for unbranded gasoline 28 − 8 105 43
Diesel 8–12 2.07 for branded and 2.68 for unbranded diesel 92 − 20
47 Transformer oil 8–12 2.9 for clean and 2.7 for waste transformer oil 70 − 3.7 75 36
Lubricant 8–12 2.5 for clean and 2.3 for waste lubricant 60 − 4.1
Proposed work Olive and corn oils 8–12 2.56 for olive oil and 3.07 for corn oil 100 − 10.74 135 76
Sunflower oil and palm oil 8–12 2.93 for sunflower oil and 2.81 for palm oil 80 − 5.99
Clean and waste brake oil 8–12 2.78 for clean and 2.69 for wase brake oil 70 − 3.97
Benzene and carbon-tetrachloride 8–12 2.55 for benzene and 2.51 for carbon-tetrachloride 90 − 3.62