Skip to main content
. 2001 Apr;45(4):1126–1136. doi: 10.1128/AAC.45.4.1126-1136.2001

TABLE 3.

Location and evidence for MDR deletions in E. colia

Operon E. coli contig accession no. Location of operon in contig (nt)b Location of deletion in contig (nt) Predicted amplification product (kbp)c
WTd Deletion strain
tolC AE000385 5769–7256 5810–7206 5.7 5.8
yjcP AE000481 9588–8122 8153–9502 5.8 5.9
yohG AE000303 3588–2392 2512–3490 5.4 5.9
ylcB AE000162 2377–3750 2402–3648 5.6 5.8
acrAB AE000152 9033–4668 4721–8937 8.5 5.7
acrEF AE000405 3660–7933 3585–7872 9.5 6.5
yhiUV AE000427 8349–12644 8432–12593 8.5 5.7
acrD AE000334 112–3225 139–3163 7.6 6.0
yegMNO AE000297 7262–14856 7317–14737 11.5 5.6
emrD AE000445 1091–2281 1114–2029 5.2 5.7
mdfA AE000186 5562–6794 5637–6720 5.2 5.5
emrAB AE000353 1902–4629 2018–4562 6.5 5.5
emrKY AE000325 2785–84 149–2716 6.7 5.5
emrE AE000160 1663–1995 1718–1974 4.5 5.7
tehAB AE000240 1932–3514 1990–3411 5.5 5.5
ybjYZ AE000189 8123–11208 8157–11189 7.1 5.5
a

Evidence for replacement of operon with the Kmr marker, based on predicted amplification product sites. 

b

nt, nucleotides. 

c

Amplification products were predicted based on location of primers located outside the DNA necessary for gene replacement (see Materials and Methods). 

d

WT, wild type.