Skip to main content
. 2022 Apr 19;6(8):2536–2547. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2021006280

Table 1.

Index treatment selected for the CORAL follow-up population

Index treatment of CORAL follow-up FAS* Unadjusted analyses Adjusted analyses
CORAL follow-up (N = 170) CORAL follow-up (N = 145)
Any chemotherapy (monotherapy or combination) 151 (88.82%) 136 (93.79%)
Immunotherapy 49 (28.82%) 44 (30.34%)
 Rituximab-based treatment 48 (28.24%) 43 (29.66%)
 Ofatumumab-based treatment 1 (0.59%) 1 (0.69%)
 Lenalidomide-based treatment 1 (0.59%) 1 (0.69%)
alloHCT 19 (11.18%) 16 (11.03%)
Best supportive care 7 (4.12%) 6 (4.14%)
Index treatment of CORAL follow-up ITT* Unadjusted analyses Adjusted analyses
CORAL follow-up (N = 205) CORAL follow-up (N = 205)
Without documented 3L+ index treatments 21 (10.24%) 21 (10.24%)
With documented 3L+ treatments
Any chemotherapy (monotherapy or combination) 140 (76.09%) 143 (77.72%)
Immunotherapy 45 (24.46%) 45 (24.46%)
 Rituximab-based treatment 44 (23.91%) 44 (23.91%)
 Ofatumumab-based treatment 1 (0.54%) 1 (0.54%)
 Lenalidomide-based treatment 1 (0.54%) 1 (0.54%)
alloHCT 19 (10.33%) 19 (10.33%)
Best supportive care 7 (3.80%) 6 (3.26%)
*

Some patients received >1 treatment in the same line of therapy; therefore, the categories are not mutually exclusive. Brentuximab vedotin, ibrutinib, axi-cel, and polatuzumab vedotin were also considered as potential index treatments; however, no patients received these therapies.