TABLE 2.
Rural area N = 283 |
City center N = 330 |
Total N = 613 |
P- value (Rural area vs. city center) |
|
Numbers of sites with NS isolates found (% of numbers in rural area, city center, and total) | ||||
| ||||
Cefazolin NS | 28 (9.9) | 23(7.0) | 51 (8.3) | 0.240 |
Ceftriaxone NS | 11 (3.9) | 4 (1.2) | 15 (2.4) | 0.038 |
Ceftazidime NS | 11 (3.9) | 4 (1.2) | 15 (2.4) | 0.038 |
Ciprofloxacin NS | 5 (1.8) | 3 (0.9) | 8 (1.3) | 0.481 |
TMP-SMX NS | 28 (9.9) | 19 (5.8) | 47 (7.7) | 0.067 |
Amoxicillin NS | 20 (7.1) | 10 (3.0) | 30 (4.9) | 0.024 |
Gentamicin NS | 4 (1.4) | 1 (0.3) | 5 (0.8) | 0.187 |
ESBL | 5 (1.8) | 1 (0.3) | 6 (1.0) | 0.10 |
ST131 | 3 (1.1) | 6 (1.8) | 9 (1.5) | 0.516 |
NS: not susceptible including resistant and intermediate.
Any collection site with one antimicrobial non-susceptible isolate was calculated. The number of intermediate (I) and resistant (R) in cefazolin: rural area: (15, 13); city center: (17, 6).
The number of intermediate (I) and resistant (R) in ceftriaxone: rural area: (2, 9); city center: (2, 2).
The number of intermediate (I) and resistant (R) in ceftazidime: rural area: (0, 11); city center: (1, 3).
The number of intermediate (I) and resistant (R) in ciprofloxacin: rural area: (2, 3); city center: (1, 2).
The number of intermediate (I) and resistant (R) in TMP-SMX: rural area: (0, 28); city center: (1, 18).
The number of intermediate (I) and resistant (R) in amoxicillin: rural area: (9, 11); city center: (4, 6).
All gentamicin NS isolates were resistant.
TMP-SMX, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole; ESBL, extended-spectrum β-lactamases; ST131, sequence type 131.