Skip to main content
. 2022 Apr 26;5(4):e229498. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.9498

Table 3. Item Response Theory Parameters for Items With Suspected DIF by Race.

Module, construct, and item a b 1 b 2 DIF type R 2 ∆β ESSD ETSSDa UETSDSa
Module 1.1, SA, gazeb
White 2.60 −1.61 −0.18 Uniform 0.012 0.02 0.08 0.05 0.91
Black/African American 2.24 −1.55 0.12
Module 1.2, SA, shared enjoymentc
White 2.01 −0.07 1.14 Uniform 0.01 0.03 0.26 0.008 0.41
Black/African American 1.79 0.07 1.56
Module 2.2, RRB, repetitive interestsd
White 0.54 0.69 1.86 Nonuniform 0.01 0.02 1.22 0.03 0.34
Black/African American 0.63 1.80 2.66
Module 3, SA, facial expressions
White 1.72 0.05 2.00 Nonuniform 0.01 0.002 0.11 0.04 0.25
Black/African American 1.32 −0.12 2.15
Module 3, SA, quality of overtures
White 2.58 −0.51 1.63 Uniform 0.01 0.03 −0.20 NA NA
Black/African American 2.47 −0.38 1.95
Module 3, SA, showing
White 1.04 0.77 3.29 Uniform 0.01 0.01 0.22 NA NA
Black/African American 1.11 0.49 2.86
Module 3, SA, initiation of joint attention
White 1.10 0.15 2.40 Uniform 0.002 0.005 0.22 NA NA
Black/African American 1.08 −0.13 2.32
Module 3, RRB, stereotyped language
White 0.86 0.26 3.02 Nonuniform 0.001 0.02 0.22 NA NA
Black/African American 0.57 0.76 4.55

Abbreviations: a, item discrimination; b, item difficulty for each level of response; DIF, differential item functioning; ESSD, expected standardized score difference; ETSSD, expected test standardized score difference; NA, not applicable; RRB, repetitive, restrictive behavior; SA, social affect; UETSDS, unsigned expected test score difference in the sample.

a

ETSSD and UETSDS are test-level statistics that assess the effect of differential functioning of all items on the total score.

b

Module 1.1 refers to module 1, no words.

c

Module 1.2 refers to module 1, words.

d

Module 2.1 refers to module 2, <5 years; module 2.2 refers to module 2, >5 years.