Skip to main content
. 2022 Apr 26;5(4):e229498. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.9498

Table 4. Item Response Theory Parameters for Items With Suspected DIF by Sex.

Module, construct, and item a b 1 b 2 DIF type R 2 ∆β ESSD ETSSD UETSDS
Module 1.1, RRB, hand mannerisms
Male 0.91 −3.03 −1.03 Nonuniform 0.01 0.01 −0.45 0.01 0.18
Female 1.15 −1.82 −0.41
Module 1.2, SA, facial expressions
Male 2.31 −0.89 1.43 Nonuniform 0.01 0.01 0.03 <0.001 0.07
Female 1.93 −1.42 1.37
Module 2.1, SA, unusual eye contact
Male 1.51 −0.42 Nonuniform 0.001 0.001 −0.03 −0.12 0.61
Female 2.77 −0.38
Module 2.1, RRB, hand mannerisms
Male 1.18 −1.06 1.18 Nonuniform 0.03 0.001 −0.66 NA NA
Female 0.94 −0.67 0.94
Module 2.2, RRB, hand mannerisms
Male 2.23 −0.84 0.32 Nonuniform 0.01 0.01 −0.64 −0.10 0.59
Female 1.94 −0.61 0.73
Module 3, SA, gaze
Male 3.53 0.00 1.34 Uniform 0.003 0.001 0.15 −0.04 0.20
Female 3.04 −0.12 1.34
Module 3, SA, initiation of joint attention
Male 1.13 −0.01 2.22 Uniform 0.002 0.006 −0.26 NA NA
Female 0.95 0.33 2.85
Module 3, RRB, hand mannerisms
Male 0.87 0.12 2.00 Uniform 0.02 0.04 −0.55 NA NA
Female 0.98 0.55 2.46

Abbreviations: a, item discrimination; b, item difficulty for each level of response; DIF, differential item functioning; ESSD, expected standardized score difference; ETSSD, expected test standardized score difference; NA, not applicable; RRB, repetitive, restrictive behaviors; SA, social affect; UETSDS, unsigned expected test score difference in the sample.