Table 2. Association of CIMT and Microalbuminuria With High CVD 10-Year Risk in Combined Study Populations and in Women and Men.
| Models | Common CIMT z score | SUA z score | uACR z score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR (95% CI) | P value | AIC/BIC | OR (95% CI) | P value | AIC/BIC | OR (95% CI) | P value | AIC/BIC | |
| Alla | |||||||||
| Model 1 | 1.55 (1.46-1.65) | <.001 | 5973.58 | 1.29 (1.20-1.39) | <.001 | 3163.38 | 1.27 (1.16-1.39) | <.001 | 2983.43 |
| Model 2 | 1.93 (1.80-2.07) | <.001 | 5264.00 | 1.32 (1.22-1.42) | <.001 | 2908.98 | 1.28 (1.16-1.40) | <.001 | 2752.09 |
| Model 3 | 1.85 (1.73-1.99) | <.001 | 5196.41 | 1.37 (1.24-1.45) | <.001 | 2809.06 | 1.34 (1.18-1.43) | <.001 | 2653.46 |
| H-L | χ2, 7.63 | .47 | NA | χ2, 6.46 | .58 | NA | χ2, 6.83 | .56 | NA |
| Womenb | |||||||||
| Model 1 | 1.62 (1.50-1.75) | <.001 | 3596.79 | 1.24 (1.11-1.38) | <.001 | 1929.75 | 1.22 (1.06-1.42) | .01 | 1797.27 |
| Model 2 | 2.01 (1.83-2.20) | <.001 | 3214.92 | 1.21 (1.08-1.36) | .01 | 1811.38 | 1.23 (1.05-1.44) | .01 | 1689.03 |
| Model 3 | 1.95 (1.78-2.14) | <.001 | 3157.65 | 1.29 (1.12-1.43) | <.001 | 1750.11 | 1.32 (1.10-1.54) | .02 | 1624.27 |
| H-L | χ2, 5.72 | .68 | NA | χ2, 11.84 | .16 | NA | χ2, 10.70 | .22 | NA |
| Menb | |||||||||
| Model 1 | 1.52 (1.38-1.68) | <.001 | 2245.76 | 1.43 (1.30-1.57) | <.001 | 1153.68 | 1.34 (1.19-1.52) | <.001 | 1124.66 |
| Model 2 | 1.83 (1.64-2.03) | <.001 | 2058.06 | 1.40 (1.27-1.55) | <.001 | 1107.17 | 1.30 (1.52-1.47) | <.001 | 1076.01 |
| Model 3 | 1.73 (1.55-1.93) | <.001 | 2052.30 | 1.46 (1.26-1.55) | <.001 | 1079.40 | 1.35 (1.15-1.46) | <.001 | 1049.15 |
| H-L | χ2, 13.35 | .10 | NA | χ2, 8.55 | .38 | NA | χ2, 8.66 | .37 | NA |
Abbreviations: AIC, Akaike information criterion; BIC, Bayesian information criterion; CIMT, carotid intima-media thickness; H-L, Hosmer-Lemeshow; NA, not applicable; OR, odds ratio; SUA, spot urine albuminuria; uACR, urine albumin-creatinine-ratio.
a
Model 1 was the unadjusted model; model 2, adjusted for sex, education, and country; model 3, adjustments as for model 2 plus household socioeconomic status, body mass index, and HIV status.
b
Model 1 was the unadjusted model; model 2, adjusted for education and country; model 3, adjustments as for model 2 plus household socioeconomic status, body mass index, and HIV status.