Skip to main content
. 2001 Apr;45(4):1184–1191. doi: 10.1128/AAC.45.4.1184-1191.2001

TABLE 2.

Pharmacokinetic parameters of drug in plasma and whole blood (for ABLC) after administration of multiple intravenous doses of Doc-AmB and ABLC to regular diet-fed and cholesterol-fed rabbitsa

Experimental group and drug AUC0–∞ (μg · h/ml) t1/2α (h) t1/2β (h) MRT (h) Vss (liters/kg) CL (ml/h/kg)
Regular diet
 Doc-AmB (plasma) 35.3 ± 9.2 4.4 ± 1.8 101.4 ± 20.8 141 ± 26 4.4 ± 2.1 30.1 ± 8.9
 ABLC (plasma) 2.6 ± 1.2c 0.3 ± 0.1c 87.1 ± 35.4c 126 ± 51 50 ± 9c 475 ± 259c
 ABLC (whole blood) 18.1 ± 3.2cd 1.8 ± 0.3cd 641.6 ± 139.5cd 920 ± 203cd 52 ± 14c 56.6 ± 11cd
Cholesterol-enriched diet
 Doc-AmB (plasma) 140.4 ± 32.8b 4.9 ± 2.3 110.3 ± 28.1 152 ± 38 1.1 ± 0.3b 7.5 ± 2.0b
 ABLC (plasma) 10.0 ± 3.9bc 4.3 ± 3.9b 209.0 ± 107.8 297 ± 159b 29 ± 11c 104 ± 24bc
 ABLC (whole blood) 90.5 ± 65.9bd 2.4 ± 0.3 2,623 ± 2,466 3,754 ± 3,544c 39 ± 11c 19.4 ± 18.6b
a

By these regimens the animals each received 1 mg of AmB per kg. The cholesterol enrichment contained 0.5% (wt/vol) cholesterol. Data are expressed as means ± standard deviations (n = 4 for Doc-AmB in plasma, n = 5 for ABLC in plasma, and n = 3 for ABLC in whole blood). t1/2α and t1/2β, α and terminal half-lives, respectively. 

b

P < 0.05 versus rabbits fed a regular diet. 

c

P < 0.05 versus Doc-AmB treatment. 

d

P < 0.05 versus ABLC (plasma).