TABLE 2.
Ea (%) and statistics | Mean (nM) ± SDb
|
Δobs-exp[EFV] | Δobs-exp[AZTTP] | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
[EFV]obs for D1 | [EFV]exp for D1 | [AZTTP]obs for D2 | [AZTTP]exp for D2 | |||
10 | 1.4 ± 0.2 | 0.48 ± 0.01 | 0.28 ± 0.01 | 0.094 ± 0.002 | 0.92 | 0.18 |
20 | 3.1 ± 0.02 | 2.5 ± 0.01 | 0.62 ± 0.05 | 0.5 ± 0.02 | 0.6 | 0.12 |
30 | 5.36 ± 0.01 | 7.83 ± 0.01 | 1.07 ± 0.01 | 1.56 ± 0.01 | −2.47 | −0.49 |
40 | 8.33 ± 0.01 | 17.22 ± 0.2 | 1.67 ± 0.02 | 3.44 ± 0.02 | −8.89 | −1.77 |
50 | 12.5 ± 0.02 | 32 ± 0.3 | 2.5 ± 0.05 | 6.4 ± 0.02 | −19.5 | −3.9 |
60 | 18.75 ± 0.05 | 51.6 ± 0.2 | 3.75 ± 0.01 | 10.32 ± 0.5 | −32.85 | −6.57 |
70 | 29.1 ± 0.02 | 80.8 ± 0.1 | 5.8 ± 0.02 | 16.16 ± 0.1 | −51 | −10.36 |
80 | 50 ± 0.5 | 136.5 ± 0.6 | 10 ± 0.1 | 27.3 ± 0.2 | −86.5 | −17.3 |
90 | 112.5 ± 0.2 | 254 ± 0.8 | 22.5 ± 0.2 | 50.8 ± 0.6 | −141.5 | −28.3 |
Statisticsc | μ1 = 26.78 ± 35.6 | μ2 = 64.77 ± 83.6∗ | μ1 = 5.35 ± 7.12 | μ2 = 12.95 ± 16.7∗ | μ = −37.9 ± 48.3 | μ = −7.59 ± 8.6∗ |
E, observed inhibition expressed as percent of control activity without drugs (Econ).
EFV, efavirenz; obs, observed effective concentration, calculated according to equation 3; exp, expected effective concentration under the null reference hypothesis I = 1, calculated according to equation 2. Δobs-exp, change between observed and expected values. D1 and D2, dose of drug 1 and drug 2 giving the indicated percentage of inhibition of RT activity when tested in the combination (D1 + D2).
μ, mean value; ∗, P < 0.05 compared to the observed value. This P value indicates that the probability that the observed value differ from the expected ones is ≥95%. Thus, the observed synergy can be considered highly significant. For details see the text.