Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Apr 27.
Published in final edited form as: J Exp Psychol Gen. 2021 Sep 30;150(12):2525–2551. doi: 10.1037/xge0001048

Table B1.

Data Set 1

Variable 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
1. OSpan
2. SymSpan   .53
3. RotSpan   .46   .63
4. Antisaccade   .27   .32   .43
5. Flanker −.09 −.15 −.17 −.16
6. Stroop   .02 −.11 −.09 −.17   .17
7. VAorient_S_k   .24   .39   .44   .46 −.14 −.16
8. FL_Cong_RT −.12 −.21 −.21 −.37   .15   .25 −.15
9. Str_Cong_RT −.12 −.23 −.26 −.34   .12   .32 −.28 .49

Note. FL_Cong_RT = mean reaction time on congruent trials in the Flanker task; Str_Cong_RT = mean reaction time on congruent trials in the Stroop task; VA = visual arrays. Computed correlation used Pearson-method with pairwise-deletion. Correlations in bold are statistically significant, p < .05.