Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Apr 27.
Published in final edited form as: J Exp Psychol Gen. 2021 Sep 30;150(12):2525–2551. doi: 10.1037/xge0001048

Table B3.

Data Set 3

Variable 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
  1. OSpan
  2. SymSpan   .54
  3. RotSpan   .53   .68
  4. RunSpatial   .53   .61   .60
  5. RunDigit   .52   .44   .49   .56
  6. Antisaccade   .38   .45   .44   .48   .40
  7. Flanker −.11 −.15 −.17 −.22 −.14 −.19
  8. Stroop −.30 −.19 −.18 −.24 −.23 −.22   .09
  9. VAcolor_k   .43   .47   .48   .59   .47   .42 −.15 −.23
10. VAorient_k   .36   .46   .43   .55   .35   .38 −.18 −.17   .59
11. VAorient_S_k   .43   .51   .50   .58   .47   .50 −.16 −.21   .60   .58
12. FL_Congruent_RT   .25   .28   .27   .42   .35   .39 −.37 −.22   .30   .28   .35
13. Str_Congruent_RT   .27   .31   .40   .40   .30   .31 −.15 −.24   .37   .30   .42   .50

Note. FL_Congruent_RT = mean reaction time on congruent trials in the Flanker task; Str_Congruent_RT = mean reaction time on congruent trials in the Stroop task; VA = visual arrays. Computed correlation used Pearson-method with pairwise-deletion. Correlations in bold are statistically significant, p < .05.