Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Apr 27.
Published in final edited form as: Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Jun;133(6):1086–1098. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003280

Table 2.

Association of Surgical Volume and Survival in Cervical Cancer (Adjusting Model)

Characteristic Disease-Free Survival
Overall Survival
Local Recurrence
Distant Recurrence
HR (95% CI) P HR (95% CI) P HR (95% CI) P HR (95% CI) P

All cases (prematching)
 Mid-volume 1 1 1 1
 High-volume 0.69 (0.58–0.82) <.001 0.73 (0.59–0.90) .003 0.62 (0.49–0.78) <.001 0.85 (0.67–1.06) .142
 Low-volume 1.09 (0.89–1.33) .397 0.91 (0.69–1.20) .509 0.95 (0.72–1.24) .696 0.93 (0.70–1.25) .645
All cases (postmatching)
 Mid- and low-volume 1 1 1 1
 High-volume 0.69 (0.57–0.84) <.001 0.75 (0.59–0.95) .016 0.65 (0.50–0.85) .001 0.78 (0.61–1.02) .066
Stage IB1 disease*
 Mid-volume 1 1 1 1
 High-volume 0.45 (0.25–0.79) .006 0.29 (0.11–0.76) .013 0.37 (0.19–0.73) .004 0.54 (0.21–1.39) .200
 Low-volume 0.99 (0.54–1.84) .982 0.31 (0.07–1.36) .121 0.95 (0.49–1.87) .890 0.56 (0.13–2.45) .439
Stage IIB disease
 Mid-volume 1 1 1 1
 High-volume 0.72 (0.53–0.96) .027 0.77 (0.55–1.08) .133 0.66 (0.45–0.98) .038 0.85 (0.58–1.26) .423
 Low-volume 0.89 (0.63–1.26) .496 0.88 (0.58–1.34) .549 0.73 (0.45–1.19) .207 0.82 (0.51–1.34) .433
Node-positive case
 Mid-volume 1 1 1 1
 High-volume 0.76 (0.60–0.97) .025 0.76 (0.57–0.99) .044 0.66 (0.47–0.92) .013 0.88 (0.66–1.18) .394
 Low-volume 0.82 (0.62–1.11) .197 0.82 (0.58–1.16) .258 0.80 (0.53–1.20) .279 0.76 (0.52–1.13) .175

HR, hazard ratio.

Association for surgical volume and survival outcome was adjusted for pretreatment factors, surgical-pathologic results, and treatment types (adjusting model 3). Pretreatment factors: age (continuous), year of diagnosis (2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, and 2008), and histology (squamous vs nonsquamous). Surgical-pathologic factors: pelvic lymph node metastasis (yes vs no), para-aortic lymph node metastasis (yes, no, or not examined), parametrial involvement (yes vs no), deep stromal invasion (yes vs no), lympho-vascular space invasion (yes vs no), tumor size (more than 4 cm vs 4 cm or less), uterine corpus invasion (yes vs no), ovarian metastasis (yes vs no), and malignant peritoneal cytology (yes, no, or not examined). Treatment types: neoadjuvant chemotherapy (yes vs no) and adjuvant therapy (radiation-based, chemotherapy-based, or none). Cox proportional hazard regression models were used for analysis. Proportional hazard assumption was tested and showed no interaction with time.

Bold indicates significant P-value.

*

Clinical stage IB1 disease without preoperative or postoperative chemotherapy or radiotherapy.