. 2022 Apr 27;12:6857. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-10953-y

Table 2.

Entry and exiting of wild, pyrethroid-resistant Anopheles gambiae sensu lato in experimental huts in Covè, southern Benin treated with pyrethroid-PBO ITNs and pirimiphos-methyl IRS applied alone and in combination.

Treatment	Total females caught*	% deterrence	Total exiting	% exophily*	95% CIs
Trial 1
Untreated net	664^a	–	241	36^a	33–40
Olyset plus	511^a	23	390	76^b	73–80
Bendiocarb IRS	556^a	16	282	51^c	47–55
Olyset Plus + bendiocarb IRS	288^b	57	228	79^b	75–84
P-methyl IRS	531^a	20	281	53^c	49–57
Olyset plus + P-methyl IRS	304^b	54	270	89^d	85–92
Trial 2
Untreated net	581^u	–	226	39^u	35–43
PermaNet 3.0	488^u	16	369	76^v	72–79
Bendiocarb IRS	575^u	1	360	63^w	59–67
PermaNet 3.0 + bendiocarb IRS	233^v	60	185	79^v	74–85
P-methyl IRS	450^u	23	311	69^x	65–73
PermaNet 3.0 + P-methyl IRS	223^v	62	195	87^y	83–92

Results are presented separately for the trials involving Olyset Plus (Trial 1) and PermaNet 3.0 (Trial 2).

*For each trial, values on this column sharing a superscript letter do not differ significantly, P > 0.05, negative binomial regression for females caught and logistic regression for exophily.