Table 3.

Blood-feeding results of wild, pyrethroid-resistant Anopheles gambiae sensu lato exposed to pyrethroid-PBO ITNs and pirimiphos-methyl IRS applied alone and in combination in experimental huts in Covè, southern Benin.

Treatment	Total females caught	Total blood-fed	% blood-feeding*	95% CIs	% blood-feeding inhibition	% personal protection
Trial 1
Untreated net	664	481	72a	69–76	–	–
Olyset plus	511	122	24b	20–28	67	75
Bendiocarb IRS	556	528	95c	93–97	− 31	− 10
Olyset Plus + bendiocarb IRS	288	64	22b	17–27	69	87
P-methyl IRS	531	420	79d	76–83	− 9	13
Olyset Plus + P-methyl IRS	304	47	16e	11–20	79	90
Trial 2
Untreated net	581	391	67u	64–71	–	–
PermaNet 3.0	488	115	24v	20–27	65	71
Bendiocarb IRS	575	519	90w	88–93	− 34	− 33
PermaNet 3.0 + bendiocarb IRS	233	54	23v	18–29	66	86
P-methyl IRS	450	406	90w	88–93	− 34	− 4
PermaNet 3.0 + P-methyl IRS	223	55	25v	19–30	63	86

Results are presented separately for the trials involving Olyset Plus (Trial 1) and PermaNet 3.0 (Trial 2).

*For each trial, values on this column sharing a superscript letter do not differ significantly, P > 0.05, logistic regression.