Table 3.
Particle size | Casson parameters | Total phenolic content | Resveratrol content | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Yield stress | Plastic viscosity | Before digestion | After digestion | Before digestion | After digestion | |||||||||
DF | F | DF | F | DF | F | DF | F | DF | F | DF | F | DF | F | |
Model | 4 | 33.17* | 5 | 17.91* | 5 | 19.92* | 2 | 430.43* | 2 | 10.27* | 3 | 9.81* | 4 | 66.20* |
Linear Mixture | 2 | 57.15* | 2 | 12.21* | 2 | 21.96* | 2 | 430.43* | 2 | 10.27* | 2 | 12.28* | 2 | 74.92* |
AB | 1 | BER | 1 | 59.03* | 1 | 52.97* | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
AC | 1 | 9.85* | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 1 | 4.85 | 1 | 60.22* |
BC | 1 | 10.89* | 1 | 11.87* | BER | BER | – | – | – | – | BER | BER | 1 | 40.11* |
ABC | – | – | 1 | 15.09* | 1 | 19.22* | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
AB(A–B) | – | – | BER | BER | 1 | 3.76 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
AC(A–C) | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
BC(B–C) | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
Residual | 8 | 6 | 7 | 10 | 10 | 9 | 8 | |||||||
Lack of Fit | 6 | 117.24* | 5 | 0.96 | 5 | 0.51 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 6 | ||||
Pure Error | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | |||||||
Cor Total | 12 | 11 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 12 | |||||||
R2 | 0.9431 | 0.9372 | 0.9343 | 0.9885 | 0.6726 | 0.7657 | 0.9707 | |||||||
Adjusted-R2 | 0.9147 | 0.8849 | 0.8874 | 0.9862 | 0.6071 | 0.6876 | 0.9560 | |||||||
Predicted-R2 | 0.8986 | 0.0668 | 0.5606 | 0.9818 | 0.5363 | 0.6007 | 0.9059 | |||||||
Adequate Precision | 14.008 | 18.101 | 16.135 | 50.363 | 8.58 | 8.52 | 25.625 |
A; sugar, B; Milk originated powders as total mass of skimmed milk and whey powders equally, C; Dried grape pomace, BER; Backward elimination regression, TPC; Total phenolic content
*P < 0.05