Skip to main content
. 2021 Dec 23;25(2):85–92. doi: 10.1136/ebmental-2021-300334

Table 2.

Summary characteristics of individual PROMs

Characteristics of individual PROMs (n=204) N %
Target age group*
 Children or adolescents 52 26
 Adults or older adults 152 74
 Type of measure
 Generic 165 81
 Designed for mental health 39 19
Main category of outcome measurement
 QOL/Well-being 190 93
 Recovery-specific 14 7
Year of development
 1960s 1 0
 1970s 4 2
 1980s 16 8
 1990s 73 36
 2000s 70 34
 2010s 40 20
Region of development
 North America 88 43
 Asia 6 3
 Europe 91 45
 Australia 8 4
 South America 1 0
 International 10 5
Characteristics of individual PROMs or PROM families relevant for MS, MN and MP EEs (n=134) n %
 MP: availability of separate adult and child/adolescents versions 16 12
 MP: availability of a proxy-completion option 27 20
 MS: feasibility of assessing outcomes beyond health, that is, capabilities or caregiver, family or social care outcomes 11 8
 MN: availability of multiple translations (two or more language versions of the instrument) 97 72
 EE: availability of a value set 15 11
 MN: availability of value set in more than one country 9 7

*If the target demographic group was not stated, the measure was considered designed for adults.

†Characteristics of 88 individual PROMs (one version available) and 116 scales grouped into 46 PROM families (more than one distinct version of the same questionnaire exist).

EE, economic evaluation; MN, multinational; MP, multiperson; MS, multisectoral; PROM, patient-reported outcome measure; QOL, quality of life.