Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 16;66(4):e01899-21. doi: 10.1128/aac.01899-21

TABLE 3.

Comparison of final model to models previously found in literature

Source Model Mean CLi (liters/h) Mean Vi (liters) Median prediction error (%) Median absolute prediction error (%)
Current study CL = TVCL × (WT/3.5)0.75 × (0.45/SCR)0.87 × (PMA/42)0.81, V = TVV × (WT/3.5) 0.398 3.09 −13.9 30.9
Frymoyer et al. (8) CL = 0.345 (WT/2.9)0.75 × Fmat × (1/SCR)0.267, Fmat = 1/(1 + [PMA/TM50]−Hill), V = 1.75 (WT/2.9), TM50 = 34.8, Hill = 4.53 0.398 2.17 −32.9 44.1
Lo et al. (9) CL = 1.0 × (WT/70)0.75 × (PMA/30)3.16 × [0.83 × SGA + 1.03 × (1 − SGA)], V = 36.6 × WT/70, SGA = 1 for small for gestational age infants, 0 for appropriate for gestational age infants 0.508 1.88 −38.5 61
Zhou et al. (10) CL = 0.0571 × (WT/1.416)0.513 × (birth WT/1.01)0.599 × (1 + 0.282 × (PNA/17)) × (1/(SCR/0.475)0.525), V = 0.791 × (WT/1.416)0.898 0.3 2.31 −14 46.2