TABLE 3.

Genotyping cost (US$) using different genotyping strategies for four aquaculture populations

Scenariosa	Atlantic salmon	Common carp	Sea bream	Rainbow trout
(1) HD	88,860	72,840	46,620	44,940
(2) 3K	44,430	36,420	23,310	22,470
(3) HD, −10%	81,,750	67,008	42,888	41,340
(4) 3K, −10%	40,875	33,504	21,444	20,670

^a (1) HD = scenario (1): all animals were genotyped with a high‐density (HD) panel. (2) 3K = scenario (2): all animals were genotyped with a 3K panel. (3) HD, −10% = scenario (3): all animals were genotyped with an HD panel, and the reference population size was reduced by 10%. (4) 3K, −10% = scenario (4): All animals were genotyped with a 3K panel, and the reference population size was reduced by 10%.