Skip to main content
. 2022 Apr 14;12:780354. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2022.780354

Table 1.

Demographics of participants.

MMP (n=49) HC (n=40) p-Value
Age (years) 70 ± 11 71 ± 9 0.820
Gender (female, %) 31 (63%) 20 (50%) 0.282
Ethnicity (White, %) 47 (96%) 39 (98%) 1.000
BMI (kg/m2)§ 28.7 (25.5-32.5) 23.6 (22.0-25.9) 0.001
Proton pump inhibitor use 5 (10%) 4 (10%) 1.000
Diet (standard diet, %) 43 (93%) 32 (82%) 0.175
Duration of disease from diagnosis (months) 33 (13-98) N/A
Positive immunofluorescence status 34 (69%) N/A
Bulbar conjunctival hyperaemia score ≥25% 14 (29%) N/A
Tetracycline use 24 (50%)
 Never 25 (50%) N/A
 Previously, Now Stopped 6 (14%) N/A
 Currently 18 (36%) N/A
Systemic immunotherapy use 38 (78%)
 Never 11 (22%) N/A
 Previously, Now Stopped 10 (20%) N/A
 Currently 28 (57%) N/A
Observed number of OTUs 225 ± 80 323 ± 87 <0.001
Shannon Diversity Index 2.92 ± 0.67 3.48 ± 0.69 <0.001

Data reported as median and interquartile range or mean and standard deviation, with p-values from Mann-Whitney U tests, or as n (%), with p-values from Fisher’s exact tests. BMI, body mass index; DIF, direct immunofluorescence. Bold p-values are significant at p<0.05.

§Data available for 83 participants.

Data available for 85 participants.

Bulbar conjunctival inflammation score (in the worse eye) was assessed using the Cicatrising Conjunctivitis Clinical Assessment Tool.

N/A, Non-applicable.