Table 2.

Statistical table

Figure	Group comparison	Data structure	Type of test	p value	95% confidence interval
1D	gfCDM vs gfCDM + KSR	Normal distribution	Welch’s t test	p < 0.0001	59.03, 65.52
1G	d9 vs d10	Normal distribution	Dunnett test	p = 0.55798	−3.63, 11.94
	d9 vs d11	Normal distribution	Dunnett test	p = 0.00166	3.89, 19.46
	d9 vs d12	Normal distribution	Dunnett test	p = 0.00033	5.95, 21.52
	d9 vs d13	Normal distribution	Dunnett test	p < 0.0001	7.41, 22.98
	d9 vs d14	Normal distribution	Dunnett test	p = 0.12627	−1.21, 14.37
	d9 vs d15	Normal distribution	Dunnett test	p = 0.14666	−1.42, 14.16
	d9 vs d16	Normal distribution	Dunnett test	p = 0.15859	−1.53, 14.05
	d9 vs d17	Normal distribution	Dunnett test	p = 0.99996	−6.85, 8.73
	d9 vs d18	Normal distribution	Dunnett test	p = 0.95885	−5.48, 10.09
	d9 vs d19	Normal distribution	Dunnett test	p = 0.90193	−5.06, 10.51
2A *	d14 vs d17	Normal distribution	Dunnett test	p = 0.5707	−0.20, 1.51
	d14 vs d21	Normal distribution	Dunnett test	p = 0.1578	−5.06, 10.51
	d14 vs d25	Normal distribution	Dunnett test	p = 0.0093	0.28, 1.99
	d14 vs d28	Normal distribution	Dunnett test	p = 0.0036	0.45, 2.16
	d14 vs d31	Normal distribution	Dunnett test	p = 0.0010	0.66, 2.38
2C, “long”	d22 vs d36	Normal distribution	Welch’s t test	p < 0.0001	−4.53, −3.86
2C, “short”	d22 vs d36	Normal distribution	Welch’s t test	p < 0.0001	−3.15, −2.69
2H	gfCDM vs gfCDM + KSR	Normal distribution	Welch’s t test	p < 0.0001	38.75, 60.04
3B *	d14 vs d31	Normal distribution	Welch’s t test	p = 0.01818	−2.89, −0.52
5C, top	SAG (−) vs (+)	Normal distribution	Welch’s t test	p < 0.0001	70.25, 93.41
5C, bottom	SAG (−) vs (+)	Normal distribution	Welch’s t test	p < 0.0001	−92.79, −82.23
5F	SAG (−) vs (+)	Normal distribution	Welch’s t test	p = 0.009963	−45.36, −8.52
5H	SAG (−) vs (+)	Normality not assumed	Brunner–Munzel test	p < 0.0001	0.77, 1.04

^*Log10-transformed data were used for statistical analysis.