Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 27;3(1):93–97. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.31.BJO-2021-0123.R1

Table I.

Recent applications and rise of machine-learning in arthroplasty literature since 2015.

Year Studies, n Study topic(s)
2015 1 Lower limb muscle activation patterns after TKA
2016 1 Gait analysis after TKA/UKA
2017 3 Classification of revision TKA cause, effect of femoral stem morphology on stress shielding, prediction of opioid use after THA
2018 5 Cost use after THA and TKA, patient activity monitoring after TKA, image-based rating of corrosion severity for THA implants, readmissions after TJR
2019 32 Clinical outcome prediction (adverse events and patient-reported outcomes), resource use and cost of episodes of care, patient activity monitoring (wearable sensors, gait analysis), automatic chart review using natural language processing, implant identification*
2020 56 Clinical outcome prediction (adverse events and patient-reported outcomes), resource use and cost of episodes of care, patient activity monitoring (wearable sensors, gait analysis), automatic chart review using natural language processing, implant identification*
2021 to date 45 Clinical outcome prediction (adverse events and patient-reported outcomes), resource use and cost of episodes of care, patient activity monitoring (wearable sensors, gait analysis), automatic chart review using natural language processing, implant identification*
*

Applications categorized into four major domains for brevity.

THA, total hip arthroplasty; TJR, total joint replacement; TKA, total knee arthroplasty; UKA, unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.