Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 12;29(4):826–841. doi: 10.1177/1073191121993558

Table 3.

The Comparison of Configural, Metric, Scalar, and Partial Scalar Invariance Models by Country.

Goodness-of-fit Model comparison
SBχ2(df) p RMSEA 90% CI CFI SRMR Ref. model ΔSBχ2(df) p ΔRMSEA ΔCFI ΔSRMR
M1: Configural 35.266(18) .009 .042 [.020, .062] .997 .012
M2: Metric 87.445(42) .000 .044 [.031, .057] .993 .048 M1 52.425(24) .001 .002 −.004 .036
M3: Scalar 355.423(66) .000 .089 [.080, .098] .955 .056 M2 284.009(24) <.001 .045 −.038 .008
M4: Partial scalar 141.693(58) .000 .051 [.040, .062] .987 .049 M2 56.511(16) <.001 .007 −.006 .001

Note. Ref. model = reference model; ΔSBχ2, ΔCFI, and ΔRMSEA = change in fit indices between contiguous nested models; SBχ2 = Satorra–Bentler scaled chi-square test statistic; df = degrees of freedom; RMSEA = root mean square error of approximation; CI = confidence interval; CFI = comparative fit index; SRMR = standardized root mean square residual.