Skip to main content
. 2022 Apr 28;202:117414. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2022.117414

Table 3.

Definitions of the Notations in This Paper.

Notations Definitions
x The universe of values of A set
u On the degree to which any element x on the domain X belongs to the A set
α The threshold for the combination of subjective weight and objective weight
β Threshold combining score function and symbol distance threshold
μAx,u Membership of u set
P Number of decisions
M Number of alternatives
N Number of criteria
D Criteria have a direct effect on another criterion
I Criteria have an indirect effect on another criterion
O The criteria have no direct or indirect influence on another criterion
B Type-2 fuzzy sets
A IT2FSs Assessment
AB The weight matrix of other criteria relative to the optimal criteria
AW Weight matrix of other criteria relative to the worst criteria
E Criteria interaction matrix
Y Adjacency Matrix
V Reachable matrix
R_ Decision Matrix
R¯ The score function is calculated to get the matrix
R¯¯ The score function and sign distance are calculated to get a matrix
RAi Average sort function
d Symbol distance
Z Comprehensive distance between the two solutions
Z¯ Comprehensive score function of the criteria
ωl weight of DMs
ωB The best subjective weight set determined by the BWM method
CR Consistency test value of subjective weight
ωIB The best subjective weight set determined by the ISM-BWM method
ωD Weights determined by the maximum deviation method
ωnr The relative weight of alternative n to alternative r
ζm The total value of alternative m
ϕmen The relative dominance of alternative m to alternative e on the nth criteria
φme Relative dominance of alternative m over alternative e
ωD Weights determined by the maximum deviation method
ωo Objective weight determined by CSMDM
ωn Comprehensive weight of the nth criteria
ξ Consistency test number in BWM method