. 2022 Apr 28;202:117414. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2022.117414

Table 21.

Ranking Results of Different MCGDM Methods.

Ranking Method	Numerical Type	A₁	A₂	A₃	Ranking
TOPSIS	$π_{1} - V a l u e$	0.429	0.424	0.369	$A_{1} > A_{2} > A_{3}$
VIKOR	$R - V a l u e$	0.197	0.214	0.220	$A_{1} > A_{2} > A_{3}$
	$S - V a l u e$	2.967	3.204	3.473	$A_{1} > A_{2} > A_{3}$
	$Q - V a l u e$	0.000	0.603	1.000	$A_{1} > A_{2} > A_{3}$
ELECTRE	$π_{2} - V a l u e$	−0.036	−0.069	0.105	$A_{3} > A_{1} > A_{2}$
PROMETHEE	$π_{3} - V a l u e$	0.282	−0.167	−0.115	$A_{1} > A_{3} > A_{2}$