Table 2.

Therapist evaluation scores (1=least desirable outcome and 5=most desirable outcome) for the BrightArm Compact system at the completion of the experimental training (session 12)^a.

Items	Scores			Question average score (SD)b
	Therapist 1c	Therapist 2d
1. It was easy to learn how to use this system	4	4	4.0 (0.00)
2. It was easy to show the patient how to use the system	4	2	3.0 (1.41)
3. It was easy to set up and run the session	4	2	3.0 (1.41)
4. It was easy to manually enter notes during the session	3	4	3.5 (0.71)
5. It was easy to put the controller on and take it off	4	4	4.0 (0.00)
6. The controller provided good grasp training	5	5	5.0 (0.00)
7. The controller provided good finger-extension training	4	5	4.5 (0.71)
8. Patients did not appear to experience discomfort during exercises	4	5	4.5 (0.71)
9. The system reduced amount of OTe assistance needed	4	3	3.5 (0.71)
10. There were few technical problems using the system	4	2	3.0 (1.41)
11. The length of exercise was appropriate for the patient	4	4	4.0 (0.00)
12. The session reports provided useful information	4	4	4.0 (0.00)
13. The intensity of training was appropriate	5	3	4.0 (1.41)
14. Overall, I am satisfied with this system	5	4	4.5 (0.71)

^aReprinted by permission of Bright Cloud International.

^bTherapist’s average score for all questions is 3.89 (SD 0.62).

^cTherapist 1 average score for all questions is 4.1 (SD 0.53).

^dTherapist 2 average score for all questions is 3.6 (SD 1.08).

^eOT: occupational therapist.