Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 8;10(4):1838–1847. doi: 10.1039/c9ra09083e

Comparison between the developed sensor and similar methods applied for CIP determination.

Probe Transducer Method Sensitivity LOD [μM] Sample Reference
Anti-ciprofloxacin IgG SPCE EIS 51.30 Ω A mol−1 L 7.5 × 10−6 Wastewater samples Proposed
Molecularly imprinted polymer (MIP) Magnetic carbon nanotubes CVb and differential pulse voltammetry 0.0228 Aa mol L−1 0.0017 Human serum, human urine and tablets 64
MIP Micromechanical cantilever Dynamic optical sensing 2.60 pg Hz−1 0.80 Water resources 65
Custom transducer Gold nanoparticles and chitosan CVb 0.0010 Biological samples 66
Multiwalled carbon nanotube, β-cyclodextrin and polyaniline Glassy carbon CVb 0.257 Aa mol L−1 0.050 Water samples 67
DNA Graphene/SPCE Square-wave voltammetry 0.136 A mol L−1 0.10 Human serum, human urine 68
Spinel structured Ba0.5Co0.5Fe2O Glassy carbon CVb 0.0102 Aa mol L−1 0.0058 Pharmaceutical formulations 69
a

Ampere.

b

Cyclic voltammetry.