Skip to main content
. 2022 Apr 14;9:854403. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.854403

Table 4.

The association between burnout and prevalence of MetS by using logistic regression analysis stratified according to age and sex.

Subgroup No. of Mets % Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Model 4
OR 95% CI p-value OR 95% CI p-value OR 95% CI p-value OR 95% CI p-value
20–40 years and female (n = 1,541)
No-Burnout (1,454) 115 7.89 1 1 1 1
Burnout (87) 18 20.51 3.04 1.58–5.85 0.001 2.93 1.52–5.68 0.001 2.45 1.22–4.92 0.01 2.34 1.14–4.80 0.02
20–40 years and male (n = 188)
No–Burnout (167) 22 13.33 1 1 1 1
Burnout (21) 4 21.11 1.62 0.41–6.39 0.49 1.65 0.41–6.56 0.48 2.37 0.53–10.58 0.26 2.15 0.38–12.03 0.38
41–73 years and female (n = 1,260)
No–Burnout (1,170) 352 30.10 1 1 1 1
Burnout (90) 32 35.80 1.30 0.74–2.28 0.36 1.37 0.77–2.44 0.29 1.33 0.74–2.40 0.34 1.25 0.69–2.29 0.46
41–73 years and male (n = 144)
No-Burnout (138) 61 44.35 1 1 1 1
Burnout (5) 1 20.00 0.23 0.03–2.13 0.20 0.19 0.02–1.84 0.15 0.24 0.02–2.82 0.26 0.28 0.02–3.59 0.33

Model 1: Unadjusted.

Model 2: Adjusted for educational level.

Model 3: Adjusted for model 2 added seniority, working hours, and work style.

Model 4: Adjusted for model 3 added exercise, smoking, drink, fruit intake, vegetable intake, and sleep quality.