Skip to main content
. 2022 Apr 14;9:854403. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.854403

Table 5.

The association between burnout and prevalence of MetS by using logistic regression analysis stratified according to age and profession.

Subgroup/profession No. of Mets % Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Model 4
OR 95% CI p-value OR 95% CI p-value OR 95% CI p-value OR 95% CI p-value
20–40 years and non-doctor/nurse (n = 363)
No-Burnout (336) 41 12.25 1 1 1 1
Burnout (27) 7 25.00 2.83 0.85–9.48 0.09 2.52 0.73–8.70 0.14 1.96 0.49–7.79 0.34 1.86 0.39–8.85 0.43
20–40 years and doctor/nurse (n = 1,367)
No-Burnout (1,287) 101 7.88 1 1 1 1
Burnout (80) 13 16.67 2.77 1.41–5.45 0.003 2.75 1.39–5.43 0.004 2.51 1.22–5.15 0.01 2.32 1.11–4.87 0.03
41–73 years and non-doctor/nurse (n = 689)
No-Burnout (648) 252 38.83 1 1 1 1
Burnout (41) 15 37.84 0.85 0.38–1.88 0.68 0.88 0.39–1.97 0.75 0.89 0.39–2.05 0.79 0.87 0.37–2.03 0.75
41–73 years and doctor/nurse (n = 714)
No-Burnout (658) 159 24.20 1 1 1 1
Burnout (56) 17 30.00 1.61 0.76–3.38 0.21 1.60 0.75–3.41 0.22 1.92 0.87–4.22 0.11 1.74 0.77–3.90 0.18

Model 1: Unadjusted.

Model 2: Adjusted for educational level.

Model 3: Adjusted for model 2 added seniority, working hours, and work style.

Model 4: Adjusted for model 3 added exercise, smoking, drink, fruit intake, vegetable intake, and sleep quality.